一鍵復(fù)制
范文為教學(xué)中作為模范的文章，也常常用來(lái)指寫(xiě)作的模板。常常用于文秘寫(xiě)作的參考，也可以作為演講材料編寫(xiě)前的參考。寫(xiě)范文的時(shí)候需要注意什么呢？有哪些格式需要注意呢？以下是小編為大家收集的優(yōu)秀范文，歡迎大家分享閱讀。
女權(quán)主義文論 女權(quán)主義理論篇一
女權(quán)主義是指主要以女性經(jīng)驗(yàn)為來(lái)源與動(dòng)機(jī)的社會(huì)理論與政治運(yùn)動(dòng)。在對(duì)社會(huì)關(guān)系進(jìn)行批判之外，許多女性主義的支持者也著重于性別不平等的'分析以及推動(dòng)?jì)D女的權(quán)利、利益與議題。那么，女權(quán)主義究竟是怎么誕生和發(fā)展起來(lái)的呢?下面這篇專八閱讀理解帶你走進(jìn)女權(quán)主義的發(fā)展之路。
students of united states history, seeking to identify the circumstances that encouraged the emergence of feminist movements, have thoroughly investigated the mid-nineteenth-century american economic and social conditions that affected the status of women. these historians, however, have analyzed less fully the development of specifically feminist ideas and activities during the same period. furthermore, the ideological origins of feminism in the united states have been obscured because, even when historians did take into account those feminist ideas and activities occurring within the united states, they failed to recognize that feminism was then a truly international movement actually centered in europe. american feminist activists who have been described as "solitary" and "individual theorists" were in reality connected to a movement -utopian socialism--which was already popularizing feminist ideas in europe during the two decades that culminated inthe first women's rights conference held at seneca falls. new york, in 1848. thus, a complete understanding of the origins and development of nineteenth-century feminism in the united statesrequires that the geographical focus be widened to include europe and that the detailed study already made of social conditions be expanded to include the ideological development of feminism.
the earliest and most popular of the utopian socialists were the saint-simonians. the specifically feminist part of saint-simonianism has, however, been less studied than the group's contribution toearly socialism. this is regrettable on two counts. by 1832 feminism was the central concern ofsaint-simonianism and entirely absorbed its adherents' energy; hence, by ignoring its feminism. european historians have misunderstood saint-simonianism. moreover, since many feminist ideascan be traced to saint-simonianism, european historians' appreciation of later feminism in franceand the united states remained limited.
saint-simon's followers, many of whom were women, based their feminism on an interpretation ofhis project to reorganize the globe by replacing brute force with the rule of spiritual powers. thenew world order would be ruled together by a male, to represent reflection, and a female, to represent sentiment. this complementarity reflects the fact that, while the saint-simonians did not reject the belief that there were innate differences between men and women, they nevertheless foresaw an equally important social and political role for both sexes in their utopia.
only a few saint-simonians opposed a definition of sexual equality based on gender distinction. this minority believed that individuals of both sexes were born similar in capacity and character, and they ascribed male-female differences to socialization and education. the envisioned result of both currents of thought, however, was that women would enter public life in the new age and that sexual equality would reward men as well as women with an improved way of life.
