姝¤繋瑷晱鑰冪爺绉樼睄鑰冪爺缍�!    鐮旂┒鐢熸嫑鐢熶俊鎭恫    鑰冨崥鐪熼涓嬭級    鑰冪爺鐪熼涓嬭級    鍏ㄧ珯鏂囩珷绱㈠紩
鏂囩珷鎼滅储
   
  楂樼礆鎼滅储   

 鎮ㄧ従鍦ㄧ殑浣嶇疆锛� 鑰冪爺绉樼睄鑰冪爺缍� >> 鏂囩珷涓績 >> 鑰冪爺鑻辫獮 >> 姝f枃  09鑰冪爺鑻辫獮闁辫畝鐞嗚В绮捐畝100绡囷紙楂樺垎鐗堬級1-8

鏂拌仦璩囪▕
鏅€氭枃绔� 涓婃捣甯�50瀹跺柈浣嶇恫涓婃帴鍙楀挩瑭㈠拰鍫卞悕
鏅€氭枃绔� 鍖椾含澶у鐢�“灏辨キ(y猫)涔嬪”鐮旂┒鐢熷皥鍫存嫑鑱樺牬闈㈢伀鐖�
鏅€氭枃绔� 寤堝ぇ濂崇爺绌剁敓琚妗堢祩瀵╁垽姹� 鍏囨墜琚垽姝诲垜
鏅€氭枃绔� 寤f澅鍏牎缍蹭笂瑭﹂粸鑰冪爺鍫卞悕灏囬枊濮�
鏅€氭枃绔� 2004骞寸ⅸ澹寳浜嫑鐢熷柈浣嶅牨鍚嶉粸涓€瑕�
鏅€氭枃绔� 娲涢櫧楂樻柊鍗€(q奴)21鍚嶇ⅸ澹爺绌剁敓琚仒鐐轰腑灞ら牁灏�
鏅€氭枃绔� 娴欐睙鐪佺ⅸ澹爺绌剁敓鍫卞悕寰炰笅鍛ㄤ竴闁嬪
鏅€氭枃绔� 2004骞翠笂娴疯€冨崁(q奴)缍蹭笂鍫卞悕鏅傞枔瀹夋帓琛�
鏅€氭枃绔� 寤f澅锛氱爺绌剁敓鍏ュ鑰冭│2003骞磋捣閲嶅ぇ瑾挎暣
鏅€氭枃绔� 2004骞村叏鍦嬬爺鎷涗笂?锛熺礀^(q奴)鍫卞悕榛炰竴瑕借〃
瑾垮姂淇℃伅
鏅€氭枃绔� 瀵у澶у04骞寸ⅸ澹爺绌剁敓瑾垮姂淇℃伅
鏅€氭枃绔� 澶ч€i惖閬撳闄�04骞寸ⅸ澹帴鏀惰鍔戠敓婧愬熀鏈師鍓�
鏅€氭枃绔� 鍚夋灄澶у寤鸿ō宸ョ▼瀛搁櫌04骞寸爺绌剁敓瑾垮姂淇℃伅
鏅€氭枃绔� 婧窞甯寖瀛搁櫌(婧窞澶у绫�)05鐮旂┒鐢熻鍔戜俊鎭�
鏅€氭枃绔� 浣虫湪鏂ぇ瀛�04骞磋€冪爺瑾垮姂淇℃伅
鏅€氭枃绔� 娌堥櫧寤虹瓚宸ョ▼瀛搁櫌04骞寸爺绌剁敓瑾垮姂淇℃伅
鏅€氭枃绔� 澶╂触甯寖澶у鏀挎不鑸囪鏀垮闄�05骞寸ⅸ澹鍔戦渶姹�
鏅€氭枃绔� 绗簩蹇楁効鑰冪爺瑾垮姂绋嬪簭绛旂枒
鏅€氭枃绔� 涓婃捣澶у04骞寸爺绌剁敓鎷涙敹绲辫€冪敓瑾垮姂淇℃伅
鏅€氭枃绔� 寤hタ澶у04骞寸ⅸ澹爺绌剁敓瑾垮姂淇℃伅

鍙嬫儏鎻愮ず锛氭湰绔欐彁渚涘叏鍦�400澶氭墍楂樼瓑闄㈡牎鎷涙敹纰╁+銆佸崥澹爺绌剁敓鍏ュ鑰冭│姝峰勾鑰冪爺鐪熼銆佽€冨崥鐪熼銆佺瓟妗�锛岄儴鍒嗗鏍℃洿鏂拌嚦2012骞�锛�2013骞�锛涘潎鎻愪緵鏀惰不涓嬭級銆� 涓嬭級娴佺▼锛� 鑰冪爺鐪熼 榛炴搳鈥�鑰冪爺瑭﹀嵎鈥濃€濅笅杓�; 鑰冨崥鐪熼 榛炴搳鈥�鑰冨崥瑭﹀嵎搴�鈥� 涓嬭級 

TEXT EIGHT

After receiving a six-year prison sentence on July 31st, Sanjay Dutt, an Indian film star, begged for bail while he appealed against it. 鈥淪ir, I made a mistake,鈥� he said. But the judge said no. Mr Dutt's crime—to have procured two guns from Muslim mobsters who were responsible for bomb attacks in Mumbai in 1993—was serious. Yet he urged Mr Dutt, 48, to return to the silver screen after serving his sentence. 鈥淒on't get perturbed,鈥� he said. 鈥淵ou have many years to go and work, like the 'Mackenna's Gold' actor Gregory Peck.鈥�

Thus ended one of the longest song-and-dances in India's criminal legal history. Mr Dutt was convicted last year, having already spent 16 months in jail. He was acquitted of direct involvement in the bombings, which killed 257 people. They were carried out in 1993 in revenge for the demolition of an ancient mosque in the Hindu holy city of Ayodhya by Hindu fanatics, and subsequent Hindu-Muslim rioting. Some 100 people have been found guilty of the bombing. They have all been sentenced in the past three months, including a dozen to death and 20 to life- imprisonment. But the alleged masterminds of the attacks are still at large. One of them, a Mumbai gangster called Dawood Ibrahim, is alleged by Indian officials to be linked to al-Qaeda and to be hiding in Pakistan.

Despite the bleak immediate outlook, Mr Dutt, who made his name playing tough-guy anti-heroes, is unlikely to find his career much damaged. The son of two of Bollywood's biggest stars, a Hindu-Muslim couple, he has garnered enormous sympathy for his suffering. Many Indians believe his claim that he wanted the guns to protect his family during the riots. Other Bollywood stars express support for Mr Dutt as passionately as their Hollywood peers worry about global warming.

Then again, Bollywood is rather shady. Gangsters and crooked politicians have long laundered ill-gotten money through film productions. Indeed Mr Dutt was investigated over money-laundering allegations in 2001. Other recent Bollywood stars to grace the courts include Monica Bedi, an actress convicted of dealing in fake passports. Her accomplice was another Mumbai gangster, Abu Salem, who delivered the guns to Mr Dutt, and is currently awaiting trial for his alleged part in the 1993 bombings.

An even bigger Bollywood star, Salman Khan, is appealing against two prison sentences of five years and one year for poaching respectively an endangered antelope and two gazelles. A Bollywood film about the case has been scheduled. Mr Khan has also had to battle a four-year-old charge that he recklessly drove his car over five people sleeping on a pavement in Mumbai, killing one of them.

Bollywood's biggest star, Amitabh Bachchan, also known as 鈥渢he Big B鈥�, is, in contrast, venerated. Where Mr Khan is vain and brash, he has a reputation for humility and Hindu piety. But even this has been imperilled of late by revelations that Mr Bachchan and his film-star son, Abhishek, bought valuable plots of land reserved for farmers. They registered themselves thus after being allotted farmland by a former government of the state of Uttar Pradesh, led by the Samajwadi party. Mr Bachchan is close to one of the party's leading lights, Amar Singh, a famed socialite. Mr Bachchan's wife, Jaya, an actress, is now also a Samajwadi politician.

1.The judge said no because _____.

[A] he believed Dutt was wronged and showed no sympathy.

[B] he did not think Dutt had committed a crime.

[C] he thought Dutt had committed a serious crime.

[D] he thought Gregory Peck was Dutt鈥檚 good example.

2. The comparison of Bollywood stars鈥� support for Dutt to Holleywood鈥檚 worries about global warming implies_____.

[A] Bollywood stars are more sympathetic than their Hollywood peers.

[B] Bollywood stars express their support in a modest way.

[C] Bollywood stars back up Dutt with strong support and full passion.

[D] Bollywood stars are also concerned with environmental issues.

3. The phrase 鈥済race the courts鈥� (Line 3, Paragraph 4) most probably means_____.

[A] present oneself in the courts

[B] appeal against the courts

[C] be sentenced by the courts

[D]show respect to the courts

4. Accroding to the passage, the following adjectives can be used to describe Mr. Khan except_____.

[A] venerated

[B] vain and brash

[C] reckless and mindless

[D] cruel

5. The best title of this passage can be _____.

[A] The Shady Bollywood

[B] Mr Dutt鈥檚 Legal History

[C] Shady Stars of Bollywood

[D] Bollywood or Bullywood

绡囩珷鍓栨瀽锛�

閫欑瘒鏂囩珷涓昏浠嬬垂浜咮ollywood褰辨槦閬曞弽娉曞緥鐨勪竴浜涘€嬫銆傛枃绔犵涓€娈�銆佺浜屾浠嬬垂浜嗗奖鏄烡utt鍏堢敓鐨勬浠讹紱绗笁娈佃瑳杩版皯鐪惧皪Dutt鐨勫瀹瑰拰鏀寔锛涚涓夋闁嬪杞夊悜Bollywood鍏朵粬褰辨槦鐘姜鐨勪竴浜涙儏娉佷粙绱�锛屼富瑕佷粙绱逛簡褰辨槦鑾凹鍗$殑鍊嬫锛涚鍥涙浠嬬垂Khan鐨勬浠讹紱绗簲娈典粙绱笲achchan鐨勬浠�銆�

瑭炲尟娉ㄩ噵锛�

bail n. 淇濋噵 procure v.鐛插緱, 鍙栧緱

at large銆€涓嶅彈鎺у埗鐨勶紱閫嶉仚娉曞鐨勶紱 perturb v. 浣块潪甯哥叐鎯�锛涗娇涓嶅畨锛屼娇鎲傛叜

demolition n. n.鐮村, 姣€澹� poach v. 鍋风嵉

garner v.鍎插瓨 anti-hero n.骞冲嚒鐨勮鑹�

accomplice n. n.鍚岃瑎鑰�, 骞厙 crooked adj. 涓嶈€佸锛岀劇鎭ョ殑锛涜⿶楱欑殑

antelope n. 缇氱緤 gazelle n. 鐬練

peer n. 鍚岃缉, 鍚岀瓑鐨勪汉 socialite n. 绀句氦鍚嶆祦

venerate v. 宕囨暚銆€

闆e彞绐佺牬锛�

(1) They were carried out in 1993 in revenge for the demolition of an ancient mosque in the Hindu holy city of Ayodhya by Hindu fanatics, and subsequent Hindu-Muslim rioting.

[涓婚珨鍙ュ紡] They were carried out 鈥�

[绲愭鍒嗘瀽] 閫欐槸涓€鍊嬬啊鍠彞锛屽叿鏈夋瘮杓冨京闆滅殑鐙€瑾烇紝鏈変竴鍊嬫檪闁撶媭瑾�锛屼竴鍊嬩互in revenge for寮曞皫鐨勭洰鐨勭媭瑾�锛涘湪瑭茬洰鐨勭媭瑾炰腑锛屾湁鍏╁€嬩粙瑭炶硴瑾�锛宼he demolition 鍜宺ioting 锛涜€屽湪绗竴鍊嬭硴瑾炰腑锛宨n the Hindu city of Ayodhya 鍜宐y Hindu fanatics閮芥槸鐢ㄤ締淇>鍓嶉潰鐨則he demolition鐨�銆�

[鍙ュ瓙璀枃]閫欎簺鐖嗙偢浜嬩欢鐧�(f膩)鐢熶簬1993骞达紝鏄偤浜嗗牨寰╁嵃搴︽暀鐙傜啽鏁欏緬姣€澹炰簡鍗板害鍦e煄Ayodhya涓€搴у彜鑰佺殑娓呯湡瀵轰互鍙婇毃鍚庣殑鍗板害——绌嗘柉鏋楁毚浜�銆�

(2) They registered themselves thus after being allotted farmland by a former government of the state of Uttar Pradesh, led by the Samajwadi party.

[涓婚珨鍙ュ紡] They registered themselves鈥�

[绲愭鍒嗘瀽] 閫欐槸涓€鍊嬬啊鍠彞锛屽彞瀛愮殑鐙€瑾炴瘮杓冨京闆�銆傝┎鐙€瑾炴槸涓€鍊嬫檪闁撶媭瑾�锛岀媭瑾炴渶鍚庣殑鎴愪唤led by 鈥︽槸涓€鍊嬮亷鍘诲垎瑭炵煭瑾烇紝鍋氬墠闈he state of Utar Pradesh鐨勫畾瑾�銆�

[鍙ュ瓙璀枃] amajwadi闋樺皫鐨勫墠Uttar Pradesh宸炴斂搴滃垎閰嶇郸浠栧€戦€欎簺鍦熷湴鍚庯紝浠栧€戝氨閫茶浜嗘敞鍐�銆�

鍏嶈铂鑱叉槑锛氭湰鏂囩郴杞夎級鑷恫绲�锛屽鏈変镜鐘�锛岃珛鑱郴鎴戝€戠珛鍗冲埅闄わ紝鍙︼細鏈枃鍍呬唬琛ㄤ綔鑰呭€嬩汉瑙€榛�锛岃垏鏈恫绔欑劇闂�銆傚叾鍘熷壍(chu脿ng)鎬т互鍙婃枃涓櫝杩版枃瀛楀拰鍏у鏈稉鏈珯璀夊锛屽皪鏈枃浠ュ強鍏朵腑鍏ㄩ儴鎴栬€呴儴鍒嗗収瀹广€佹枃瀛楃殑鐪熷鎬�銆佸畬鏁存€с€佸強鏅傛€ф湰绔欎笉浣滀换浣曚繚璀夋垨鎵胯锛岃珛璁€鑰呭儏浣滃弮鑰�锛屽苟璜嬭嚜琛屾牳瀵︾浉闂滃収瀹�銆�

  • 涓婁竴绡囨枃绔狅細

  • 涓嬩竴绡囨枃绔狅細
  • 鑰冨崥鍜ㄨQQ 3455265070 榛炴搳閫欓噷绲︽垜鐧�(f膩)娑堟伅 鑰冪爺鍜ㄨ QQ 3455265070 榛炴搳閫欓噷绲︽垜鐧�(f膩)娑堟伅 閮电锛� 3455265070@qq.com
    鍏徃鍚嶇ū:鏄嗗北鍓�(chu脿ng)閰蜂俊鎭鎶€鏈夐檺鍏徃 鐗堟瑠鎵€鏈�
    鑰冪爺绉樼睄缍� 鐗堟瑠鎵€鏈� © kaoyanmiji.com All Rights Reserved
    鑱叉槑锛氭湰缍茬珯灏婇噸骞朵繚璀风煡璀樼敘娆�锛屾牴鎿氥€婁俊鎭恫绲″偝鎾瑠淇濊姊濅緥銆�锛屽鏋滄垜鍊戣綁杓夋垨寮曠敤鐨勪綔鍝佷镜鐘簡鎮ㄧ殑娆婂埄锛岃珛閫氱煡鎴戝€�锛屾垜鍊戞渻鍙婃檪鍒櫎锛�