姝¤繋瑷晱(w猫n)鑰冪爺绉樼睄鑰冪爺缍�(w菐ng)!    鐮旂┒鐢熸嫑鐢熶俊鎭恫(w菐ng)    鑰冨崥鐪熼涓嬭級    鑰冪爺鐪熼涓嬭級    鍏ㄧ珯鏂囩珷绱㈠紩
鏂囩珷鎼滅储
   
  楂樼礆(j铆)鎼滅储   

 鎮ㄧ従(xi脿n)鍦ㄧ殑浣嶇疆锛� 鑰冪爺绉樼睄鑰冪爺缍�(w菐ng) >> 鏂囩珷涓績 >> 鑰冪爺鑻辫獮(y菙) >> 姝f枃  2008骞磋€冪爺鑻辫獮(y菙)鍌欒€冭硣鏂欙細闁辫畝鐞嗚В椤岀簿閬�

鏂拌仦璩囪▕
鏅€氭枃绔� 涓婃捣甯�50瀹跺柈浣嶇恫(w菐ng)涓婃帴鍙楀挩瑭㈠拰鍫�(b脿o)鍚�
鏅€氭枃绔� 鍖椾含澶у(xu茅)鐢�“灏辨キ(y猫)涔嬪”鐮旂┒鐢熷皥鍫�(ch菐ng)鎷涜仒鍫�(ch菐ng)闈㈢伀鐖�
鏅€氭枃绔� 寤堝ぇ濂崇爺绌剁敓琚妗堢祩瀵╁垽姹� 鍏囨墜琚垽姝诲垜
鏅€氭枃绔� 寤f澅鍏牎缍�(w菐ng)涓婅│榛�(di菐n)鑰冪爺鍫�(b脿o)鍚嶅皣闁�(k膩i)濮�
鏅€氭枃绔� 2004骞寸ⅸ澹寳浜嫑鐢熷柈浣嶅牨(b脿o)鍚嶉粸(di菐n)涓€瑕�
鏅€氭枃绔� 娲涢櫧(y谩ng)楂樻柊鍗€(q奴)21鍚嶇ⅸ澹爺绌剁敓琚仒鐐轰腑灞ら牁(l菒ng)灏�(d菐o)
鏅€氭枃绔� 娴欐睙鐪佺ⅸ澹爺绌剁敓鍫�(b脿o)鍚嶅緸涓嬪懆涓€闁�(k膩i)濮�
鏅€氭枃绔� 2004骞翠笂?锛熺礀^(q奴)缍�(w菐ng)涓婂牨(b脿o)鍚嶆檪(sh铆)闁撳畨鎺掕〃
鏅€氭枃绔� 寤f澅锛氱爺绌剁敓鍏ュ(xu茅)鑰冭│2003骞磋捣閲嶅ぇ瑾�(di脿o)鏁�
鏅€氭枃绔� 2004骞村叏鍦�(gu贸)鐮旀嫑涓�?锛熺礀^(q奴)鍫�(b脿o)鍚嶉粸(di菐n)涓€瑕借〃
瑾�(di脿o)鍔戜俊鎭�
鏅€氭枃绔� 瀵у澶у(xu茅)04骞寸ⅸ澹爺绌剁敓瑾�(di脿o)鍔戜俊鎭�
鏅€氭枃绔� 澶ч€i惖閬撳(xu茅)闄�04骞寸ⅸ澹帴鏀惰(di脿o)鍔戠敓婧愬熀鏈師鍓�
鏅€氭枃绔� 鍚夋灄澶у(xu茅)寤鸿ō(sh猫)宸ョ▼瀛�(xu茅)闄�04骞寸爺绌剁敓瑾�(di脿o)鍔戜俊鎭�
鏅€氭枃绔� 婧窞甯寖瀛�(xu茅)闄�(婧窞澶у(xu茅)绫�)05鐮旂┒鐢熻(di脿o)鍔戜俊鎭�
鏅€氭枃绔� 浣虫湪鏂ぇ瀛�(xu茅)04骞磋€冪爺瑾�(di脿o)鍔戜俊鎭�
鏅€氭枃绔� 娌堥櫧(y谩ng)寤虹瓚宸ョ▼瀛�(xu茅)闄�04骞寸爺绌剁敓瑾�(di脿o)鍔戜俊鎭�
鏅€氭枃绔� 澶╂触甯寖澶у(xu茅)鏀挎不鑸囪鏀垮(xu茅)闄�05骞寸ⅸ澹(di脿o)鍔戦渶姹�
鏅€氭枃绔� 绗簩蹇楁効鑰冪爺瑾�(di脿o)鍔戠▼搴忕瓟鐤�
鏅€氭枃绔� 涓婃捣澶у(xu茅)04骞寸爺绌剁敓鎷涙敹绲�(t菕ng)鑰冪敓瑾�(di脿o)鍔戜俊鎭�
鏅€氭枃绔� 寤hタ澶у(xu茅)04骞寸ⅸ澹爺绌剁敓瑾�(di脿o)鍔戜俊鎭�

鍙嬫儏鎻愮ず锛氭湰绔欐彁渚涘叏鍦�(gu贸)400澶氭墍楂樼瓑闄㈡牎鎷涙敹纰╁+銆佸崥澹爺绌剁敓鍏ュ(xu茅)鑰冭│姝峰勾鑰冪爺鐪熼銆佽€冨崥鐪熼銆佺瓟妗堬紝閮ㄥ垎瀛�(xu茅)鏍℃洿鏂拌嚦2012骞�锛�2013骞�锛涘潎鎻愪緵鏀惰不(f猫i)涓嬭級銆� 涓嬭級娴佺▼锛� 鑰冪爺鐪熼 榛�(di菐n)鎿娾€�鑰冪爺瑭﹀嵎鈥濃€濅笅杓�; 鑰冨崥鐪熼 榛�(di菐n)鎿娾€�鑰冨崥瑭﹀嵎搴�(k霉)鈥� 涓嬭級 

锛堜竴锛夋硶寰嬮

GOING BACK AND GETTING IT RIGHT

By almost every measure, Paul Pfingst is an unsentimental prosecutor. Last week the San Diego County district attorney said he fully intends to try suspect Charles Andrew Williams, 15, as an adult for the Santana High School shootings. Even before the tragedy, Pfingst had stood behind the controversial California law that mandates treating murder suspects as young as 14 as adults.

So nobody would have wagered that Pfingst would also be the first D.A. in the U.S. to launch his very own Innocence Project. Yet last June, Pfingst told his attorneys to go back over old murder and rape convictions and see if any unravel with newly developed DNA-testing tools. In other words, he wanted to revisit past victories--this time playing for the other team. "I think people misunderstand being conservative for being biased," says Pfingst. "I consider myself a pragmatic guy, and I have no interest in putting innocent people in jail."

Around the U.S., flabbergasted defense attorneys and their jailed clients cheered his move. Among prosecutors, however, there was an awkward pause. After all, each DNA test costs as much as $5,000. Then there's the unspoken risk: if dozens of innocents turn up, the D.A. will have indicted his shop.

But nine months later, no budgets have been busted or prosecutors ousted. Only the rare case merits review. Pfingst's team considers convictions before 1993, when the city started routine DNA testing. They discard cases if the defendant has been released. Of the 560 remaining files, they have re-examined 200, looking for cases with biological evidence and defendants who still claim innocence.

They have identified three so far. The most compelling involves a man serving 12 years for molesting a girl who was playing in his apartment. But others were there at the time. Police found a small drop of saliva on the victim's shirt--too small a sample to test in 1991. Today that spot could free a man. Test results are due any day. Inspired by San Diego, 10 other counties in the U.S. are starting DNA audits.

By Amanda Ripley ez ncisco sijevic rtwell; Lisa McLaughlin; Joseph Pierro; Josh Tyrangiel and Sora Song

娉�(1)鏈枃閬歌嚜Time; 03/19/2001, Vol. 157 Issue 11, p62, 1p, 2c, 3bw

娉�(2)鏈枃缈�(x铆)椤屽懡椤屾ā浠垮皪(du矛)璞�2004骞寸湡椤宼ext 1.

1.How did Pfingst carry out his own Innocence Project?

[A]By getting rid of his bias against the suspects.

[B]By revisiting the past victories.

[C]By using the newly developed DNA-testing tools.

[D]By his cooperation with his attorneys.

2.Which of the following can be an advantage of Innocence Project?

[A]To help correct the wrong judgments.

[B]To oust the unqualified prosecutors.

[C]To make the prosecutors in an awkward situation.

[D]To cheer up the defense attorneys and their jailed clients.

3.The expression 鈥渇labbergasted鈥�(Line 1, Paragraph 3) most probably means _______.

[A]excited

[B]competent

[C]embarrassed

[D]astounded

4.Why was Pfingst an unsentimental prosecutor?

[A]He intended to try a fifteen-year old suspect.

[B]He had no interest in putting the innocent in jail.

[C]He supported the controversial California law.

[D]He wanted to try suspect as young as fourteen.

5.Which of the following is not true according to the text?

[A]Pfingst鈥檚 move didn鈥檛 have a great coverage.

[B] Pfingst鈥檚 move had both the positive and negative effect.

[C] Pfingst鈥檚 move didn鈥檛 work well.

[D]Pfingst鈥檚 move greatly encouraged the jailed prisoners.

绡囩珷鍓栨瀽

鏈枃閲囩敤鐨勬槸瑷樻晿鏂囩殑妯″紡銆傜涓€娈垫寚鍑鸿姮鏂壒浣滅偤涓€浣嶉惖闈㈢劇(w煤)绉佺殑妾㈡煡瀹樼殑涓€浜涘仛娉�锛涚浜屾鎸囧嚭鑺柉鐗瑰(sh铆)鏂解€滄竻鐧借▓(j矛)鍔冣€濈殑鎵撶畻鍙婂仛娉�锛涚涓夋鎸囧嚭瀵�(sh铆)鏂解€滄竻鐧借▓(j矛)鍔冣€濋€犳垚鐨勫弽鎳�(y墨ng)浠ュ強鍙兘瀛樺湪鐨勫晱(w猫n)椤�锛涚鍥涙鍜岀浜旀鏄(sh铆)鏂解€滄竻鐧借▓(j矛)鍔冣€濈殑绲�(ji茅)鏋滃拰褰遍熆銆�

瑭炲尟娉ㄩ噵

prosecutor [5prRsIkju:tE(r)]n.妾㈠療瀹� ,妾㈠療鍝�,璧疯ù浜�,鍘熷憡

controversial [kRntrE5v\:F(E)l]adj.鐖�(zh膿ng)璜栫殑, 鐖�(zh膿ng)璀扮殑

mandate [5mAndeIt]v.鎵规簴(zh菙n)鍒惰▊涓€鍊�(g猫)瑷�(x霉n)浠�锛屽閫氶亷(gu貌)娉曞緥锛涚櫦(f膩)甯冨懡浠ゆ垨瑕佹眰锛�

wager [5weIdVE(r)]v.涓嬭抄娉�, 淇濊瓑

conviction [kEn5vIkF(E)n]n.瀹氱姜, 瀹e憡鏈夌姜

unravel[Qn5rAv(E)l]v. 闂℃槑, 瑙f焙

flabbergast[5flAbE^B:st; (?@) -^Ast]v.<鍙�>浣垮ぇ鍚冧竴椹�, 鍟炵劧澶辫壊, 浣跨洰鐬彛鍛�

indict[In5daIt]v.璧疯ù, 鎺у憡, 鎸囨帶, 鍛婄櫦(f膩)

bustv.鐮寸敘(ch菐n)鎴栫己閷�

oustv.鍓濆オ, 鍙栦唬, 椹�(q奴)閫�

discard[dI5skB:d]v.鎷嬮枊(k膩i)锛涢伜妫�锛涘虎妫�

molest[mE5lest]v.楱蜂簜, 鍥版摼, 瑾�(di脿o)鎴�

saliva[sE5laIvE]n.鍙f按, 鍞炬恫

闆e彞绐佺牬

1.Even before the tragedy, Pfingst had stood behind the controversial California law that mandates treating murder suspects as young as 14 as adults.

涓婚珨鍙ュ紡锛氣€fingst had stood behind 鈥�

绲�(ji茅)妲�(g貌u)鍒嗘瀽锛欵ven before the tragedy鏄湰鍙ョ殑鏅�(sh铆)闁撶媭瑾�(y菙)锛涗富鍙ユ槸Pfingst had stood behind鈥�;that 寮曞皫(d菐o)鐨勮硴瑾�(y菙)寰炲彞淇>law;鍦ㄥ緸鍙ヤ腑锛宎s鈥s鏄竴瑭炵祫锛屾剰鎬濇槸鈥滃拰鈥︿竴妯b€�锛涘嚭鐝�(xi脿n)鐨勭涓夊€�(g猫)as鏄粙瑭烇紝鎰忔€濇槸鈥滀綔鐐衡€�銆�

鍙ュ瓙璀枃锛氱敋鑷冲湪閫欏牬(ch菐ng)鎮插妵鐧�(f膩)鐢熶箣鍓嶈姮鏂壒灏辨敮鎸佸姞鍒╃灏间簽宸炵殑涓€闋�(xi脿ng)闋楁湁鐖�(zh膿ng)璀扮殑娉曞緥銆傞€欓爡(xi脿ng)娉曞緥瑕�(gu墨)瀹�锛屼互鎴愪汉韬唤鍙楀鐨勮瑎娈哄珜鐤戠姱鐨勬渶浣庡勾榻″彲浠ラ檷鍒板崄鍥涙銆�

椤岀洰鍒嗘瀽

1.绛旀鐐篊锛屽爆浜嬪(sh铆)绱�(x矛)绡€(ji茅)椤�銆傛枃涓皪(du矛)鎳�(y墨ng)淇℃伅鈥淧fingst told his attorneys to go back over old murder and rape convictions and see if any unravel with newly developed DNA-testing tools.鈥濇槸灏�(du矛)绗簩娈电涓€鍙ョ殑瑁�(b菙)鍏呰(shu艒)鏄庛€�

2.绛旀鐐篈锛屽爆鎺ㄧ悊鍒ゆ柗椤�銆傚緸涓婁笅鏂囨垜鍊戝彲浠ュ緱鐭�锛屽(sh铆)鏂解€滄竻鐧借▓(j矛)鍔冣€濆氨鏄娇鐢ㄥ厛閫�(j矛n)鐨凞NA鎶€琛�(sh霉)渚�(l谩i)閲嶆柊瀵╃悊閬�(gu貌)鍘荤殑妗堜欢鐣�(d膩ng)涓彲鑳藉瓨鍦ㄧ殑鍐ゆ閷�(cu貌)妗�銆�

3.绛旀鐐篋, 灞寽瑭為銆傚緸绗簩娈电涓€鍙ヨ┍鎴戝€戝緱鐭ヨ姮鏂壒鍙兘鏄編鍦�(gu贸)绗竴鍊�(g猫)瀵�(sh铆)鏂介潪甯哥崹(d煤)鐗圭殑鈥滄竻鐧借▓(j矛)鍔冣€濈殑浜�锛屽洜姝や粬鐨勫仛娉曞緢鍙兘鏄护浜烘劅鍒板悆椹氱殑锛屽緸鑰屽彲鐚滃嚭瑭茶鐨勫惈缇�銆�

4.绛旀鐐築锛屽爆鎺ㄧ悊鍒ゆ柗椤�銆傚緸绗竴娈靛拰绗簩娈电郸鍑虹殑浜嬩緥鎴戝€戝彲浠ョ湅鍑�锛岃姮鏂壒涓嶆効鏀鹃亷(gu貌)浠讳綍涓€鍊�(g猫)鐘姜鐨勪汉锛屽嵆渚夸粬鐨勫勾榻¢倓涓嶇畻澶�锛涗粬涔熶笉鎰夸娇鐒�(w煤)杈滆€呰挋鍐わ紝鍗充究妗堜欢宸茬稉(j墨ng)瀵╃悊銆�

5.绛旀鐐篊锛屽爆鎺ㄧ悊鍒ゆ柗椤�銆傛鍥�?y脿n)?鈥淧fingst鈥檚 move works well鈥�,缇庡湅(gu贸)鎵嶅張鏈夆€渢en other counties are starting DNA audits鈥�,鑰屼笖锛屸€渘o budgets have been busted or prosecutors ousted鈥�.

鍏嶈铂(z茅)鑱叉槑锛氭湰鏂囩郴杞�(zhu菐n)杓夎嚜缍�(w菐ng)绲�(lu貌)锛屽鏈変镜鐘�锛岃珛(q菒ng)鑱�(li谩n)绯绘垜鍊戠珛鍗冲埅闄�锛屽彟锛氭湰鏂囧儏浠h〃浣滆€呭€�(g猫)浜鸿榛�(di菐n)锛岃垏鏈恫(w菐ng)绔欑劇(w煤)闂�(gu膩n)銆傚叾鍘熷壍(chu脿ng)鎬т互鍙婃枃涓櫝杩版枃瀛楀拰鍏�(n猫i)瀹规湭缍�(j墨ng)鏈珯璀夊(sh铆)锛屽皪(du矛)鏈枃浠ュ強鍏朵腑鍏ㄩ儴鎴栬€呴儴鍒嗗収(n猫i)瀹�銆佹枃瀛楃殑鐪熷(sh铆)鎬с€佸畬鏁存€с€佸強鏅�(sh铆)鎬ф湰绔欎笉浣滀换浣曚繚璀夋垨鎵胯锛岃珛(q菒ng)璁€鑰呭儏浣滃弮鑰�锛屽苟璜�(q菒ng)鑷鏍稿(sh铆)鐩搁棞(gu膩n)鍏�(n猫i)瀹�銆�

  • 涓婁竴绡囨枃绔狅細

  • 涓嬩竴绡囨枃绔狅細
  • 鑰冨崥鍜ㄨQQ 3455265070 榛�(di菐n)鎿婇€欓噷绲︽垜鐧�(f膩)娑堟伅 鑰冪爺鍜ㄨ QQ 3455265070 榛�(di菐n)鎿婇€欓噷绲︽垜鐧�(f膩)娑堟伅 閮电锛� 3455265070@qq.com
    鍏徃鍚嶇ū:鏄嗗北鍓�(chu脿ng)閰蜂俊鎭鎶€鏈夐檺鍏徃 鐗堟瑠(qu谩n)鎵€鏈�
    鑰冪爺绉樼睄缍�(w菐ng) 鐗堟瑠(qu谩n)鎵€鏈� © kaoyanmiji.com All Rights Reserved
    鑱叉槑锛氭湰缍�(w菐ng)绔欏皧閲嶅苟淇濊(h霉)鐭ヨ瓨(sh铆)鐢�(ch菐n)娆�(qu谩n)锛屾牴鎿�(j霉)銆婁俊鎭恫(w菐ng)绲�(lu貌)鍌虫挱娆�(qu谩n)淇濊(h霉)姊濅緥銆�锛屽鏋滄垜鍊戣綁(zhu菐n)杓夋垨寮曠敤鐨勪綔鍝佷镜鐘簡鎮ㄧ殑娆�(qu谩n)鍒╋紝璜�(q菒ng)閫氱煡鎴戝€�锛屾垜鍊戞渻(hu矛)鍙婃檪(sh铆)鍒櫎锛�