銆€銆€2010骞�鑰冪爺鑻辫獮缈昏鍘熸枃锛�

銆€銆€One basic weakness in a conservation system based wholly one economic motives is that most members of the land.community have no economic value. Yet these ereatures are members of the biotic community and, if its stability depends on its inteyrity, they are entitled to continuance銆�

銆€銆€When one of these noneconomic categories is threatened and, if we happen to love it, we invert excuses to give it economic importance.at the beginning of century songbirds were supposed to be disappearing. 46. Scientists jumped to the resure with some distimctly shaky evidence to the effect that insects would eat us up of birds failed to control them, the evideuce had to be comic in order to be valid銆�

銆€銆€It is pamful to read these round about accounts today. we have no land ethic yet. 47. But we have at least drawn near the point of admitting that birds should continue as a matter of intrinsic right, regardless of the presence or absence of economic advantage to us銆�

銆€銆€A panallel situation exists in respect of predatory mamals and fish-eating birds. 48. Time was when biologists somewhat over worded the evidence that these creatures preserve the health of game by killing the physically weak,or that they prey only on 鈥渨orthless species鈥�銆�

銆€銆€Some species of tree have been read out of the party by economics-minded foresters because they grow too slowly .or have too low a sale vale to pay as imeber crops. 49. In Europe ,where forestry is ecologically more advanced, the non-commercial tree species are recognized as members of native forest community, to be preserved as such , within reason銆�

銆€銆€To sum up: a system of conservation based solely on economic self-interest is hopelessly lopsided. 50. It tends to ignore, and thus eventually to eliminate, many elements in the land community that lack commercial value, but that are essential to its healthy functioning without the uneconomic pats銆�

銆€銆€2010骞磋€冪爺鑻辫獮缈昏鍙冭€冭鏂囷細

銆€銆€46.Scientists jumped to the rescue with some distinctly shaky evidence to the effect that insects would eat us up if birds failed to control them銆�

銆€銆€绉戝(xu茅)瀹跺€戞彁鍑轰竴浜涙槑椤珯涓嶄綇鑵崇殑璀夋摎(j霉)渚嗚(b菙)鏁�锛屽叾澶ф剰鏄細濡傛灉槌ラ鐒℃硶鎺у埗瀹宠煵锛岄偅涔堥€欎簺瀹宠煵灏辨渻鍚冨厜鎴戝€�?n猫i)绁熸偤?/p>

銆€銆€47. But we have at least drawn nearer the point of admitting that birds should continue as a matter of intrinsic right, regardless of the presence or absence of ecnomic advantage to us銆�

銆€銆€浣嗘垜鍊戣嚦灏戝咕涔庝篃鎵胯獚(r猫n)閫欐ǎ涓€鍊嬩簨瀵�(sh铆)锛氫笉绠￠偿椤炴槸鍚︾郸鎴戝€戝付渚嗙稉(j墨ng)婵�(j矛)涓婄殑濂借檿锛屼絾槌ラ浣滅偤鐢熺墿鏈兘鐨勬瑠(qu谩n)鍒╅€欎竴鍟忛灏囩辜绾�(x霉)瀛樺湪銆�

銆€銆€48. Time was when biologists somewhat over-worded the evidence that these creatures preserve the health of game by killing the physically weak, or that they prey only on "worthless" species銆�

銆€銆€鏇惧咕浣曟檪锛岀敓鐗╁(xu茅)瀹跺€戞湁榛�(di菐n)閬庡害浣跨敤閫欏€嬭瓑鎿�(j霉)锛屽嵆閫欎簺鐗╃ó閫氶亷娈烘楂旇唱(zh矛)寮辫€呮垨鑰呭儏鎹曢閭ｄ簺瀹冨€戣獚(r猫n)鐐虹劇鍍瑰€肩殑鐗╃ó渚嗙董鎸侀鐗╅張鐨勬甯搁亱(y霉n)杞�(zhu菐n)銆�

銆€銆€49. In europe, where forestry is ecologically more advanced, the non-commercial tree species are recognized as members of the native forest "community to be preserved as such, within reason銆�

銆€銆€鍦ㄦ瓙娲诧紝鏋楁キ(y猫)鍦ㄧ敓鎱�(t脿i)鏂归潰鏇村姞鐧�(f膩)閬�(d谩)锛岀劇鍟嗘キ(y猫)鍍瑰€肩殑妯圭ó琚鐐哄師鐢熸．鏋楃兢钀界殑鎴愬摗锛岃€屽緱鍒板悎鐞嗙殑淇濊(h霉)銆�

銆€銆€50. It tends to ignore, and thus eventually to eliminate, many elements in the land community that lack commercial value, but that are essential to its healthy functioning銆�

銆€銆€瀹冩槗浜庡拷瑕�锛屽洜鑰屾渶绲傛渻娑堥櫎闄稿湴缇ら珨閲岀殑瑷卞瑕佺礌锛岄洊鐒堕€欎簺瑕佺礌缂轰箯鍟嗘キ(y猫)鍍瑰€�锛屼絾閫欏皪鍏跺仴搴烽亱(y霉n)琛屼締瑾槸蹇呰鐨�銆�

銆€銆€鑰冭│绲�(ji茅)鏉熶箣鍚庢杩庡弮鑸�鏀挎不銆佽嫳瑾�銆�鏁�(sh霉)瀛�(xu茅)瑷庤珫锛岀櫦(f膩)琛ㄤ綘鐨勮榛�(di菐n)鍜屾劅鍙�锛岃垏缍�(w菐ng)鍙嬪皪涓€灏嶇瓟妗堛€備粖骞磋│椤岄洠涓嶉洠锛熸柊娴暀鑲茬壒绱勫浣嶅悕甯湪璜栧閫�(j矛n)琛�24灏忔檪绛旂枒銆傞€佽€冭│绁濈锛岃珛榛�(di菐n)鎿婇€�(j矛n)鍏ヨū鎰垮皥鍗€(q奴)銆傝嚜鎴戞劅瑕鸿€冨緱涓嶅ソ鐨勶紝姝¤繋閫�(j矛n)渚嗙櫦(f膩)娉勪竴涓�銆傛杩庡弮鑸�2010骞磋€冪爺鎴愮妇闋�(y霉)娓強寰�(f霉)瑭�绶氶爯(y霉)娓�锛屽苟鏌ョ湅鍏朵粬浜虹殑浼板垎銆�