銆€銆€鑰冪爺鑻辫獮(y菙)闁辫畝鐨勬枃绔犱締(l谩i)婧愪簬鍦�(gu贸)澶栨湡鍒婃垨闆滃織銆傜溇鎵€鍛ㄧ煡閫欎簺鏂囩珷娴告煋浜嗚タ鏂瑰紡鐨勫(xi臎)浣滃偝绲�(t菕ng)鈥斺€旇榛�(di菐n)楫槑锛岄倧杓毚(y谩n)瀵�锛屽叏鏂囧彧鏈変竴鍊�(g猫)涓婚鎬濇兂銆傝€岄€欑ó涓婚鎬濇兂鏄互鏍稿績姒傚康鐨勫舰寮忛珨鐝�(xi脿n)鍑轰締(l谩i)鐨�銆傛垜鍊�?c猫)闄傚柨x鏂囩珷鏅�(sh铆)锛岃嫢鑳芥湁鎰忚瓨(sh铆)鍦板皨鎵炬牳蹇冩蹇碉紝灏辨渻(hu矛)鎻愰珮瑙ｉ閫熷害鍜屾簴(zh菙n)纰虹巼銆�

銆€銆€涓€銆佷粈涔堟槸鏍稿績姒傚康锛�

銆€銆€鏂囩珷鐨勬牳蹇冩蹇碉紝鍗冲叏鏂囪珫杩扮殑涓績锛屽張鍚嶄腑蹇冭锛岄€氬父浠ュ悕瑭炴垨鍚嶈鐭獮(y菙)鐨勫舰寮忓嚭鐝�(xi脿n)銆傛牳蹇冩蹇典笉涓€瀹氭槸涓€鍊�(g猫)锛屾湁鏅�(sh铆)鏄叐鍊�(g猫)锛屾鏅�(sh铆)瑕佹敞鎰忓叐鍊�(g猫)姒傚康涔嬮枔鐨勫崁(q奴)鍒ュ拰鑱�(li谩n)绯汇€�

銆€銆€浜�銆佸浣曟壘鏍稿績姒傚康锛�

銆€銆€涓€鑸締(l谩i)瑾�(shu艒)锛屾枃绔犵殑姣忎竴鑷劧娈甸兘鏈�(hu矛)鍚枃绔犵殑鏍稿績姒傚康锛屾姄浣忓嚭鐝�(xi脿n)闋荤巼鏈€楂樼殑鍚嶈鎴栧悕瑭炵煭瑾�(y菙)鍗冲彲銆傛湁鏅�(sh铆)锛岄€欏€�(g猫)鍚嶈鏈�(hu矛)浠ュ悓缇╄銆佹寚浠ｉ棞(gu膩n)绯荤殑褰㈠紡鍑虹従(xi脿n)锛岄渶瑕佸紩璧锋垜鍊戠殑娉ㄦ剰銆�

銆€銆€涓夈€佹牳蹇冩蹇电殑褰㈠紡锛�

銆€銆€鍒嗙偤鏂囩珷鐨勬牳蹇冩蹇靛拰娈佃惤鐨勬牳蹇冩蹇靛叐绋€傛枃绔犵殑鏍稿績姒傚康閬嶅竷鍏ㄦ枃锛屾钀界殑鏍稿績姒傚康灞簬姣忎竴鑷劧娈靛収(n猫i)閮ㄧ殑鏍稿績璜栬堪灏�(du矛)璞°€�

銆€銆€鍥�銆佹牳蹇冩蹇电殑浣滅敤锛�

銆€銆€鎵惧嚭鏂囩珷鐨勬牳蹇冩蹇垫渻(hu矛)鎻愮ず涓绘棬椤�(鍟�(w猫n)main idea)鐨勭瓟妗�銆傛枃绔犺垏娈佃惤鐨勬牳蹇冩蹇靛苟鐢紝涔熸渻(hu矛)鎻愮ず澶ч儴鍒嗕簨瀵�(sh铆)绱�(x矛)绡€(ji茅)椤屽拰渚嬭瓑椤�(鍟�(w猫n)example)鐨勭瓟妗�锛涘皪(du矛)姣斿洓鍊�(g猫)閬搁爡(xi脿ng)锛屽惈鏈夋牳蹇冩蹇电殑閫氬父鐐烘纰虹瓟妗�銆�

銆€銆€鎴戝€戜互2007骞磋€冪爺鑻辫獮(y菙)鐪熼闁辫畝鐞嗚ВText 4鐐轰緥锛�

銆€銆€(鏂囩珷鐨勬牳蹇冩蹇电敤榛戦珨琛ㄧず锛屾钀界殑鏍稿績姒傚康鐢ㄤ笅鍔冪窔(xi脿n)琛ㄧず)

銆€銆€It never rains but it pours. Just as bosses and boards have finally sorted out their worst accounting and compliance troubles, and improved their feeble corporation governance, a new problem threatens to earn them 鈥� especially in America 鈥� the sort of nasty headlines that inevitably lead to heads rolling in the executive suite: data insecurity. Left, until now, to odd, low-level IT staff to put right, and seen as a concern only of data-rich industries such as banking, telecoms and air travel, information protection is now high on the boss鈥檚 agenda in businesses of every variety銆�

銆€銆€Several massive leakages of customer and employee data this year 鈥� from organizations as diverse as Time Warner, the American defense contractor Science Applications International Corp and even the University of California, Berkeley 鈥� have left managers hurriedly peering into their intricate IT systems and business processes in search of potential vulnerabilities銆�

銆€銆€鈥淒ata is becoming an asset which needs to be guarded as much as any other asset,鈥� says Haim Mendelson of Stanford University鈥檚 business school. 鈥淭he ability to guard customer data is the key to market value, which the board is responsible for on behalf of shareholders銆傗€� Indeed, just as there is the concept of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)锛� perhaps it is time for GASP, Generally Accepted Security Practices, suggested Eli Noam of New York鈥檚 Columbia Business School. 鈥淪etting the proper investment level for security, redundancy, and recovery is a management issue, not a technical one,鈥� he says銆�

銆€銆€The mystery is that this should come as a surprise to any boss. Surely it should be obvious to the dimmest executive that trust, that most valuable of economic assets, is easily destroyed and hugely expensive to restore 鈥� and that few things are more likely to destroy trust than a company letting sensitive personal data get into the wrong hands銆�

銆€銆€The current state of affairs may have been encouraged 鈥� though not justified 鈥� by the lack of legal penalty (in America, but not Europe) for data leakage. Until California recently passed a law, American firms did not have to tell anyone, even the victim, when data went astray. That may change fast: lots of proposed data-security legislation is now doing the rounds in Washington, D.C. Meanwhile, the theft of information about some 40 million credit-card accounts in America, disclosed on June 17th, overshadowed a hugely important decision a day earlier by America鈥檚 Federal Trade Commission (FTC) that puts corporate America on notice that regulators will act if firms fail to provide adequate data security銆�

銆€銆€瑭�(p铆ng)鏋愶細閫欑瘒鏂囩珷鐨勬牳蹇冩蹇靛嵆鈥滄暩(sh霉)鎿�(j霉)娉勬紡锛屽洜姝よ淇濊(h霉)鏁�(sh霉)鎿�(j霉)鈥濄€傜涓€娈垫彁鍑烘枃绔犱富椤�锛岀浜屾鎻忚堪鍟�(w猫n)椤岀従(xi脿n)璞★紝绗笁娈佃(shu艒)鏄庤淇濊(h霉)锛岀鍥涙鎻愬嚭淇′换鑸囨暩(sh霉)鎿�(j霉)淇濊(h霉)鐨勯棞(gu膩n)绯伙紝trust鎴愮偤娈佃惤涓績瑭�锛屾湯娈垫彁鍑鸿绔嬫硶瑙ｆ焙锛宭egal鎴愮偤娈佃惤涓績瑭炪€�

銆€銆€36. The statement 鈥淚t never rains but it pours鈥� is used to introduce

銆€銆€[A] the fierce business competition銆�

銆€銆€[B] the feeble boss-board relations銆�

銆€銆€[C] the threat from news reports.[D] the severity of data leakage銆�

銆€銆€瑭�(p铆ng)鏋愶細鏈绛旀D銆傝瑾�(y菙)鐨勭洰鐨勮嚜鐒舵槸寮曞嚭涓婚锛屾壘鍚湁鏍稿績姒傚康鐨勯伕闋�(xi脿ng)鍗冲彲銆�

銆€銆€38. In bringing up the concept of GASP the author is making the point that

銆€銆€[A] shareholders鈥� interests should be properly attended to銆�

銆€銆€[B] information protection should be given due attention銆�

銆€銆€[C] businesses should enhance their level of accounting security銆�

銆€銆€[D] the market value of customer data should be emphasized銆�

銆€銆€瑭�(p铆ng)鏋愶細鏈绛旀B銆傛彁鍑篏ASP锛岃嚜鐒舵槸璀夋槑涓婚鈥滄暩(sh霉)鎿�(j霉)淇濊(h霉)鈥濄€傛敞鎰廌閬搁爡(xi脿ng)闆栨湁data锛屼絾鍏堕噸蹇冭惤鍦╰he market value涓婇潰锛屽亸闆富椤�銆�

銆€銆€39. According to Paragraph 4, what puzzles the author is that some bosses fail to

銆€銆€[A] see the link between trust and data protection銆�

銆€銆€[B] perceive the sensitivity of personal data銆�

銆€銆€[C] realize the high cost of data restoration銆�

銆€銆€[D] appreciate the economic value of trust銆�

銆€銆€瑭�(p铆ng)鏋愶細鏈绛旀A銆備綔鐐轰簨瀵�(sh铆)绱�(x矛)绡€(ji茅)椤岃瀹氫綅娈佃惤锛孉閬搁爡(xi脿ng)鏃㈠惈鏈夋钀戒腑蹇冭锛屽張鍚湁鏂囩珷鏍稿績姒傚康锛岄珨鐝�(xi脿n)浜嗙窗(x矛)绡€(ji茅)椤屾棦瑕佹湇寰炴钀戒富椤岋紝鍙堣鏈嶅緸鏂囩珷涓婚鐨勫師鍓�銆�

銆€銆€40. It can be inferred from Paragraph 5 that

銆€銆€[A] data leakage is more severe in Europe銆�

銆€銆€[B] FTC鈥檚 decision is essential to data security銆�

銆€銆€[C] California takes the lead in security legislation銆�

銆€銆€[D] legal penalty is a major solution to data leakage銆�

銆€銆€瑭�(p铆ng)鏋愶細鏈绛旀D銆傚師鍥犲悓39椤屼竴妯�銆�

 銆€銆€                                      鏂版澅鏂硅€冪爺鑻辫獮(y菙)闁辫畝鍚嶅斧 鍚虫磱