绗簲澶╋細鎶撲綇閲嶉粸(di菐n) 闁辫畝鐐哄厛---绲�(ji茅)妲�(g貌u)绡�

涓€銆佸畯瑙€绲�(ji茅)妲�(g貌u)

鏈枃瑷庤珫鐨勭祼(ji茅)妲�(g貌u)鏄叏鏂囩殑瀹忚绲�(ji茅)妲�(g貌u)锛岃垏鍓嶄竴澶╂墍瑾殑娈佃惤绲�(ji茅)妲�(g貌u)涓嶅悓銆傚畯瑙€绲�(ji茅)妲�(g貌u)涓€鑸垏鏂囩珷鐨勪富椤屼互鍙婃枃绔犲睍闁嬫柟寮忔湁闂�(gu膩n)銆�鑰冪爺闁辫畝鏂囩珷涓昏鏈変簲绋畯瑙€绲�(ji茅)妲�(g貌u)锛氫竴鏋濈崹(d煤)绉€鍨�銆佽姳闁嬪叐鏈靛瀷銆佸堡灞ら仦閫�(j矛n)鍨�銆佸晱椤�---绛旀鍨�銆佸晱椤�---瑙ｆ焙鏂规鍨嬬瓑锛屽叾涓姳闁嬪叐鏈靛瀷鑸囧晱椤�---绛旀鍨嬭純甯歌銆備互鑺遍枊鍏╂湹鍨嬬偤渚嬶紝鏂囩珷闁嬪鎻愬嚭鍏╁€�(g猫)鏍稿績姒傚康鎴栧叐鍊�(g猫)鏂归潰锛岄毃鍚庡垎娈佃珫杩般€傛妸鎻￠€欑ó鏂囩珷鐨勯棞(gu膩n)閸垫槸娉ㄦ剰閫欏叐鍊�(g猫)鏍稿績姒傚康鐨勫畾缇�锛屼互鍙婂畠鍊戠殑鍗€(q奴)鍒ュ拰鑱�(li谩n)绯汇€傞€欑ó绲�(ji茅)妲�(g貌u)鍒嗙偤鍏╅锛屼竴绋槸鍏╁€�(g猫)姒傚康鏄苟鍒楃殑锛屽彟涓€绋槸鍏╁€�(g猫)姒傚康褰㈡垚灏�(du矛)姣�锛屽皪(du矛)浜庡悗涓€绋枃绔犺娉ㄦ剰鍏╁€�(g猫)姒傚康涔嬮枔鐨勫崁(q奴)鍒ワ紝浠ュ強浣滆€呭皪(du矛)鍚勮嚜鐨勬厠(t脿i)搴�銆備笅闈㈡槸2003骞磋€冪爺闁辫畝绗笁绡囨枃绔犵殑瀹忚绲�(ji茅)妲�(g貌u)鍒嗘瀽銆�

浜�銆佸畯瑙€绲�(ji茅)妲�(g貌u)鍒嗘瀽

In recent years, railroads have been combining with each other, merging into super systems, causing heightened concerns about monopoly. As recently as 1995, the top four railroads accounted for under 70 percent of the total ton-miles moved by rails. Next year, after a series of mergers is completed, just four railroads will control well over 90 percent of all the freight moved by major rail carriers.

Supporters of the new supersystems argue that these mergers will allow for substantial cost reductions and better coordinated service. Any threat of monopoly, they argue, is removed by fierce competition from trucks. But many shippers complain that for heavy bulk commodities traveling long distances, such as coal, chemicals, and grain, trucking is too costly and the railroads therefore have them by the throat.

The vast consolidation within the rail industry means that most shippers are served by only one rail company. Railroads typically charge such “captive” shippers 20 to 30 percent more than they do when another railroad is competing for the business. Shippers who feel they are being overcharged have the right to appeal to the federal government’s Surface Transportation Board for rate relief, but the process is expensive, time consuming, and will work only in truly extreme cases.

Railroads justify rate discrimination against captive shippers on the grounds that in the long run it reduces everyone’s cost. If railroads charged all customers the same average rate, they argue, shippers who have the option of switching to trucks or other forms of transportation would do so, leaving remaining customers to shoulder the cost of keeping up the line. It’s a theory to which many economists subscribe, but in practice it often leaves railroads in the position of determining which companies will flourish and which will fail. “Do we really want railroads to be the arbiters of who wins and who loses in the marketplace? ” asks Martin Bercovici, a Washington lawyer who frequently represents shippers.

Many captive shippers also worry they will soon be hit with a round of huge rate increases. The railroad industry as a whole, despite its brightening fortunes. still does not earn enough to cover the cost of the capital it must invest to keep up with its surging traffic. Yet railroads continue to borrow billions to acquire one another, with Wall Street cheering them on. Consider the $10.2 billion bid by Norfolk Southern and CSX to acquire Conrail this year. Conrail’s net railway operating income in 1996 was just $427 million, less than half of the carrying costs of the transaction. Who’s going to pay for the rest of the bill? Many captive shippers fear that they will, as Norfolk Southern and CSX increase their grip on the market.

鏈枃鐨勫畯瑙€绲�(ji茅)妲�(g貌u)鏄姳闁嬪叐鏈靛瀷銆備綔鑰呬粙绱逛簡杩戝咕骞撮惖璺妤�(y猫)涓苟璩肩殑鎯呮硜鍜岃定鍕�(sh矛)锛岄棥杩颁簡鍏╂淳—骞惰臣鏀寔鑰咃紙railroads锛夊拰閻佃矾鎵橀亱(y霉n)鍟嗭紙shippers锛夊皪(du矛)骞惰臣鐨勪笉鍚屾厠(t脿i)搴�銆傚苟璩兼敮鎸佽€呰獚(r猫n)鐐洪€欐ǎ鍙互闄嶄綆鎴愭湰锛屾彁渚涙洿濂界殑鏈嶅嫏(w霉)锛涗絾鏄ū澶氶惖璺墭閬�(y霉n)鍟嗛兘鎶辨€ㄨ骞惰臣瀹规槗灏�(d菐o)鑷村鏂�锛屼娇閬�(y霉n)杓歌不(f猫i)鐜囧ぇ骞呬笂婕�銆傞柋璁€鏅�(sh铆)娉ㄦ剰杞�(zhu菐n)鎶樿but鍜岃〃绀烘厠(t脿i)搴︾殑瑭炲尟銆�