閫欑瘒鏂囩珷杓冮洠鐞嗚В锛屽悓瀛稿€戞噳瑭茬収鎴戜笅鍒楃殑涓夊堡鎬濊矾鐤忛€氳┎鏂囷細

銆€銆€1.閫欑瘒鏂囩珷鐨勭涓€娈垫槸绺借珫锛屾寚鍑虹瀛歌垏鍏跺畠绀炬渻鏂囧寲涔嬮枔鐨勭煕鐩惧緢鍤村郴銆�

銆€銆€2.绗�234娈垫弿杩扮瀛稿鍊戝弽鎿婂叾瀹冮儴闁€锛屾枼涔嬬偤鍙嶇瀛革紙antiscience锛�銆�
 
    3.绗�567娈靛墖鎸囧嚭绉戝瀹跺€戠殑妯规暤鑼冨湇閬庡锛屾寜鏂囨湯鍝堜經涓€瀛歌€呯殑瑭辫锛屸€滄墍鏈夐偅浜涚叐鎿炬垨濞佽剠閭ｄ簺鑷互鐐烘洿闁嬫槑鐨勪汉锛堟寚绉戝瀹讹級鐨勪汉鈥濋兘鏈冭璨间笂鍙嶇瀛哥殑甯藉瓙銆�

銆€銆€鎺ヨ憲鍐嶅幓鎬濊€冩湯灏剧殑鍟忛Q62锛岀瓟妗堥伕鍝€�锛�

銆€銆€Passage3

銆€銆€Science has long had an uneasy relationship with other aspects of culture. Think of Gallileo鈥檚17th-century trial for his rebelling belief before the Catholic Church of poet William Blake鈥檚 harsh remarks against the mechanistic worldview of Isaac Newton. The schism between science and the humanities has锛宨f anything锛宒eepened in this century.

銆€銆€Until recently锛宼he scientific community was so powerful that it could afford to ignore its critics but no longer. As funding for science has declined锛宻cientists have attacked 鈥渁ntiscience鈥� in several books锛宯otably Higher Superstition锛宐y Paul R.Gross锛宎 biologist at the University of Virginia锛宎nd Norman Levitt锛宎 mathematician at Rutgers University; and The Demon-Haunted World锛宐y Car Sagan of Cornell University.

銆€銆€Defenders of science have also voiced their concerns at meetings such as 鈥淭he Flight from Science and Reason锛屸€漢eld in New York City in1995锛宎nd 鈥淪cience in the Age of锛圡is锛塱nformation锛屸€漺hich assembled last June near Buffalo.

銆€銆€Antiscience clearly means different things to different people. Gross and Levitt find fault primarily with sociologists锛宲hilosophers and other academics who have questioned science鈥檚 objectivity. Sagan is more concerned with those who believe in ghosts锛宑reationism and other phenomena that contradict the scientific worldview.

銆€銆€A survey of news stories in1996reveals that the antiscience tag has been attached to many other groups as well锛宖rom authorities who advocated the elimination of the last remaining stocks of smallpox virus to Republicans who advocated decreased funding for basic research.

銆€銆€Few would dispute that the term applies to the Unabomber锛寃hose manifesto锛宲ublished in1995锛宻corns science and longs for return to a pretechnological utopia. But surely that does not mean environmentalists concerned about uncontrolled industrial growth are antiscience锛宎s an essay in US News & World Report last May seemed to suggest.

銆€銆€The environmentalists锛宨nevitably锛宺espond to such critics. The true enemies of science锛宎rgues Paul Ehrlich of Stanford University锛宎 pioneer of environmental studies锛宎re those who question the evidence supporting global warming锛宼he depletion of the ozone layer and other consequences of industrial growth. Indeed锛宻ome observers fear that the antiscience epithet is in danger of becoming meaningless. 鈥淭he term 鈥榓(ch菐n)ntiscience鈥� can lump together too many锛宷uite different things锛屸€漬otes Harvard University philosopher Gerald Holton in his1993work Science and Anti-Science. 鈥淭hey have in common only one thing that they tend to annoy or threaten those who regard themselves as more enlightened.鈥�

銆€銆€62.The author鈥檚 attitude toward the issue of 鈥渟cience vs. antiscience鈥� is .

銆€銆€A. impartial B. subjective C. biased D. puzzling

銆€銆€閫欓亾椤屾秹鍙婁綔鑰呭皪鈥滅瀛竝k鍏跺畠鏂囧寲鈥濋€欏€嬬煕鐩剧殑鎱�(t脿i)搴�銆傚緸绗竴娈电殑闁嬮牠灏辫兘鐪嬪嚭锛屼綔鑰呭彧鏄互灞€澶栦汉鐨勫Э鎱�(t脿i)锛屾寚鍑哄叐鑰呬箣闁撶殑鐭涚浘鍤村郴锛屼綔鑰呮噳瑭叉槸涓珛鎱�(t脿i)搴�锛涘啀鑰�锛屾牴鎿�(j霉)涓婇潰灏嶆枃绔犱富椤屽叐灞よ獮缇╃殑鍒嗘瀽锛屼綔鑰呮棦鎸囧嚭绉戝瀹剁殑鍙嶆搳锛屼篃鎸囧嚭浠栧€戠殑閬庣伀锛屾彌瑷€涔�锛屼綔鑰呯殑瑷庤珫鏄緢杈ㄨ瓑鐨勶紝鏄瑙€涓珛鐨�銆傜稖鍚堣捣渚嗭紝绛旀閬窤鈥滀腑绔嬬殑鈥�銆�

銆€銆€鑳芥帴鍙楀棊锛熷悓瀛稿€戣瀛告渻姝ｇ⒑鍦板垎鏋愭枃绔犵殑涓绘棬鍜屼綔鑰呯殑鍌惧悜锛屽緸鑰屾妸椤岀洰浣滃皪銆�