銆€銆€Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A,B,Cor D on ANSWER SHEET1.(10points)

銆€銆€The homeless make up a growing percentage of America鈥檚 population.__1__ homelessness has reached such proportions that local government can鈥檛 possibly _____2____. To help homeless people _____3___ independence, the federal government must support job training programs,_____4_____ the minimum wage, and fund more low-cost housing._____5____everyone agrees on the numbers of Americans who are homeless. Estimates ____6__ anywhere from 600,000 to 3 million. _____7__ the figure may vary, analysts do agree on another matter: that the number of the homeless is_____8____, one of the federal government鈥檚 studies _____9__ that the number of the homeless will reach nearly 19 million by the end of this decade.

銆€銆€Finding ways to __10__ this growing homeless population has become increasingly difficult.___11__when homeless individuals manage to find a ___12__ that will give them three meals a day and a place to sleep at night, a good number still spend the bulk of each day__13__ the street, Part of the problem is that many homeless adults are addicted to alcohol or drugs. And a significant number of the homeless have serious mental disorders. Many others,____14____not addicted or mentally ill, simply lack the everyday __15__ skills need to turn their lives _____16__.Boston Globe reporter Chris Reidy notes that the situation will improve only when there are_17___programs that address the many needs of the homeless. _____18__ Edward Blotkowsk, director of community service at Bentley College in Massachusetts,___19__it. 鈥淭here has to be _____20___of programs. What we need is a package deal.鈥�

銆€銆€1.[A]Indeed [B]Likewise [C]Therefore [D]Furthermore

銆€銆€2.[A]stand [B]cope [C]approve [D]retain

銆€銆€3.[A]in [B]for [C]with [D]toward

銆€銆€4.[A]raise [B]add [C]take [D]keep

銆€銆€5.[A]generally [B]almost [C]hardly [D]not

銆€銆€6.[A]cover [B]change [C]range [D]differ

銆€銆€7.[A]Now that [B]Although [C]Provided [D]Except that

銆€銆€8.[A]inflating [B]expanding [C]increasing [D]extending

銆€銆€9.[A]predicts [B]displays [C]proves [D]discovers

銆€銆€10.[A]assist [B]track [C]sustain [D]dismiss

銆€銆€11.[A]Hence [B]But [C]Even [D]Only

銆€銆€12.[A]lodging [B]shelter [C]dwelling [D]house

銆€銆€13.[A]searching [B]strolling [C]crowding [D]wandering

銆€銆€14.[A]when [B]once [C]while [D]whereas

銆€銆€15.[A]life [B]existence [C]survival [D]maintenance

銆€銆€16.[A]around [B]over [C]on [D]up

銆€銆€17.[A]complex [B]comprehensive [C]complementary [D]compensating

銆€銆€18.[A]So [B]Since [C]As [D]Thus

銆€銆€19.[A]puts [B]interprets [C]assumes [D]makes

銆€銆€20.[A]supervision [B]manipulation [C]regulation [D]coordination

涓€銆佸畬鍨嬪～绌哄弮鑰冭鏂囷細

銆€銆€鐒″鍙鑰呭崰缇庡湅浜哄彛鐨勬瘮渚嬭秺渚嗚秺澶�銆傝€屼笖锛岀劇瀹跺彲姝歌€呭凡缍�(j墨ng)澧炲姞浜嗗湴鏂规斂搴滈兘鐒℃硶鎳�(y墨ng)灏嶇殑鍦版銆傜偤浜嗗公鍔╃劇瀹跺彲姝歌€呰蛋鍚戠崹绔嬶紝鑱�(li谩n)閭︽斂搴滃繀闋堟敮鎸佸氨妤�(y猫)鍩硅〒(x霉n)闋呯洰銆佹彁楂樻渶浣庡伐璩囧苟璩囧姪寤鸿ō(sh猫)鏇村浣庡児浣忔埧銆傜編鍦嬪埌搴曟湁澶氬皯鐒″鍙鑰呭ぇ瀹剁殑鎰忚骞朵笉涓€鑷�锛屼及瑷堟槸鍦�60钀埌300钀箣闁撱€傜洝绠′汉鍊戜及瑷堢殑鏁�(sh霉)瀛楀彲鑳藉悇涓嶇浉鍚�锛屽垎鏋愬鍊戝皪鍙﹀涓€鍊嬪晱椤岀殑鎰忚鐨勭⒑鏄竴鑷寸殑锛氱劇瀹跺彲姝歌€呯殑鏁�(sh霉)閲忔鍦ㄥ闀枫€傝伅(li谩n)閭︽斂搴滅殑涓€闋呯爺绌堕爯(y霉)娓�锛屽湪鏈崄骞寸祼(ji茅)鏉熶箣鍓嶏紝鐒″鍙鑰呯殑鏁�(sh霉)閲忓皣鎺ヨ繎1900钀�銆�

銆€銆€鎯宠睛娉曞公鍔╅€欎簺瓒婁締瓒婂鐨勭劇瀹跺彲姝歌€呬换鍕�(w霉)瓒婁締瓒婅壉宸ㄣ€傚嵆浣跨劇瀹跺彲姝歌€呮壘鍒颁簡浣忚檿锛岀櫧澶╂湁涓夐锛屾櫄涓婅兘瀹夌湢锛岄倓鏄渻鏈夊緢澶氫汉姣忓ぉ澶ч儴鍒嗘檪闁撴祦钀借闋�銆傞儴鍒嗗晱椤屾槸锛岃ū澶氱劇瀹跺彲姝哥殑鎴愬勾浜洪兘鏄厭楝兼垨鑰呯櫘鍚涘瓙锛涜€岀浉鐣�(d膩ng)澶氱殑鐒″鍙鑰呮偅鏈夊毚(y谩n)閲嶇殑绮剧鐥�锛涢倓鏈夎ū澶氫汉闆栫劧涓嶅枬閰掑惛姣掞紝绮剧涔熸甯�锛屼絾灏辨槸娌掓湁浣胯嚜宸辩炕韬殑鍩烘湰鐢熸椿鑳藉姏?锛佹伀銊婃D鐠�(hu谩n)鐞冩棩鍫便€嬭鑰呭厠閲屾柉.闆疯开瑾�(r猫n)鐐哄彧鏈夐€氶亷鍏ㄩ潰瑕�(gu墨)鍔冧締瑙ｆ焙閫欎簺鐒″鍙鑰呯殑鍚勭ó闇€姹傦紝閫欑ó灞€闈㈡墠鏈夊彲鑳藉緱鍒版敼鍠�銆傜敤棣璜稿宸炴湰鐗归噷瀛�(xu茅)闄㈢ぞ鍗€(q奴)鏈嶅嫏(w霉)閮ㄤ富浠绘剾寰疯彲.甯冪緟鐗圭鐡︽柉鍏嬬殑瑭变締瑾氨鏄細鈥滃悇绋(gu墨)鍔冨繀闋堝崝(xi茅)瑾�(di脿o)閬嬭锛屾垜鍊戦渶瑕佺殑鏄竴绫冨瓙瑷堝妰?锛�?/P>

銆€銆€浜屻€佸弮鑰冪瓟妗堝強瑕侀粸鍒嗘瀽锛�

銆€銆€1. D.鏈彞鎺ョ涓€鍙�銆傚墠鍙ヨ鐒″鍙鑰呯殑姣斾緥瓒婁締瓒婂ぇ锛屾帴涓嬩締鐨勯€欏彞瑭辫〃绀洪仦閫�(j矛n)锛屾墍浠ラ伕furthermore銆侫閬搁爡琛ㄧず鈥滅殑纰衡€�锛孊閬搁爡likewise鎰忔€濈偤鈥滃悓鐞�锛屽悓妯ｂ€�锛孋閬搁爡therefore琛ㄧず鍥犳灉闂�(gu膩n)绯�锛屼笁鍊嬮尟瑾ら伕闋呭共鎿炬€ф渶澶х殑鏄疉閬搁爡锛屽洜鐐哄緸閭忚集涓婁締鍒嗘瀽锛屽畠鍏ラ伕鐨勫彲鑳戒篃寰堝ぇ锛屼絾鐩告瘮涔嬩笅閬為€�(j矛n)鐨勬剰鎬濇洿绗﹀悎閭忚集銆傞洠搴︼細鈽嗏槅鈽嗏槅

銆€銆€2. B 閫欓噷琛ㄧず绗竴鍙ヤ腑鎻愬埌鐨勫晱椤屽凡缍�(j墨ng)璁撳湴鏂规斂搴滅劇娉曟噳(y墨ng)浠樹簡锛屽洜姝ら伕鎿嘽ope(鎳�(y墨ng)浠橈紝鎳�(y墨ng)灏�)銆侫閬搁爡stand琛ㄧず鈥滃蹇嶁€濓紝C閬搁爡approve琛ㄧず鈥滃悓鎰忊€�锛孌閬搁爡retain琛ㄧず鈥滀繚鐣欌€濓紝鍧囦笉鍚堥鎰�銆傞洠搴︼細鈽嗏槅

銆€銆€3. D 鏈彞琛ㄧず鈥滃公鍔╃劇瀹跺彲姝哥殑浜鸿蛋鍚戠崹绔嬧€濓紝鏁呴伕鎿噒oward銆傛湰椤岀殑骞叉摼闋呮槸C閬搁爡鐨剋ith銆傞洊鐒舵垜鍊戝(xu茅)閬巘o help sb. with鈥﹂€欐ǎ鐨勫彞鍨�锛屼絾瑭插彞鍨嬭〃绀虹殑鏄€滃公鍔╂煇浜哄仛/瀛�(xu茅)浠€涔堚€濈殑鎰忔€�锛屽help me with my English(骞姪鎴戝(xu茅)缈�(x铆)鑻辫獮)锛宧elp me with my exercises(骞姪鎴戝仛浣滄キ(y猫))銆傞洠搴︼細鈽嗏槅鈽�

銆€銆€4. A 閫欓噷琛ㄧず鈥滄彁楂樻渶浣庡伐璩囧緟閬団€�锛屽彧鏈夌暥(d膩ng)浜哄€戣兘澶犳帣鍒版洿澶氱殑閷�锛岀劇瀹跺彲姝哥殑浜烘墠鏈冩笡灏�锛屾晠閬竢aise銆傚共鎿鹃爡鏄疊閬搁爡add銆傞洊鐒禷dd涔熻〃绀哄鍔�锛屼絾鐣�(d膩ng)琛ㄩ仈(d谩)鎻愰珮宸ヨ硣鏅�锛屾垜鍊戜娇鐢╮aise锛岃€屼笉鐢╝dd銆傞洠搴︼細鈽�

銆€銆€5. D 鏈鍥涘€嬮伕闋呬腑锛孉閬搁爡generally鍜孊閬搁爡almost琛ㄧず鑲畾鍚京锛孋閬搁爡hardly鍜孌閬搁爡not琛ㄧず鍚﹀畾銆傛牴鎿�(j霉)涓婁笅鏂�锛屾湰鍙ヨ鐨勬槸鈥滃苟闈炴瘡鍊嬩汉閮藉悓鎰忊€�锛屾墍浠ユ帓闄鍜孊銆傚悓鏅�锛宧ardly鍙兘鑸嘺nyone绛夎鎼厤锛岃〃绀衡€滃咕涔庢矑鏈変换浣曚汉鈥�锛屼笉鑳借垏everyone鎼厤锛屾晠姝ｇ⒑绛旀鐐簄ot銆侼ot everyone agrees鈥﹁〃绀衡€滀笉鏄瘡鍊嬩汉閮藉悓鎰忊€︹€︹€濈殑鎰忔€�銆傞洠搴︼細鈽�

銆€銆€6. C 鏈彞鎰忔€濈偤鈥滀及瑷堟暩(sh霉)瀛楃殑鑼冨湇澶х磩寰�60钀埌300钀箣闁撯€�锛屼娇鐢╮ange from鈥o鈥︾殑鍙ュ瀷銆傚共鎿鹃爡鏄疉閬搁爡鐨刢over锛屼絾cover琛ㄧず鈥滆钃嬧€�锛屼笉琛ㄧず鑼冨湇銆侱閬搁爡differ涓昏寮疯(di脿o)涓嶅悓锛岃€屾湰鍙ュ苟鏈挤瑾�(di脿o)涓嶅悓锛岃€屾槸寮疯(di脿o)鑼冨湇锛屾晠閬告搰range銆傞洠搴︼細鈽嗏槅鈽�

銆€銆€7. B 鏍规摎(j霉)鍚庢枃锛屾湰鍙ヨ〃閬�(d谩)鐨勬槸璁撴鎰忕京锛屽嵆锛屸€滈洊鐒跺皪閫欎竴鏁�(sh霉)瀛椾汉鍊戞剰瑕嬩笉涓€锛屼絾浜哄€戝嵒閮藉悓鎰忓彟澶栦竴鍊嬩簨瀵︹€濓紝鍥犳閬告搰although銆傚叾浣欓伕闋呬笉鍚堥鎰忋€傞洠搴︼細鈽�

銆€銆€8. C 鏈鐐鸿鍖鲸鏋愰銆傚洓鍊嬮伕闋呴兘琛ㄩ仈(d谩)鈥滃鍔�锛屾摯寮碘€濈殑鍚京锛屼絾鐢变簬鏈彞涓昏獮鐐簍he number锛屽洜姝ゅ彧鑳芥惌閰峣ncrease銆侫閬搁爡inflate琛ㄧず鈥滆啫鑴光€�锛孊閬搁爡expand琛ㄧず鈥滃湪闈㈢⿳涓婃摯寮碘€濓紝D閬搁爡extend琛ㄧず鈥滃湪闀峰害涓婂欢浼糕€�銆傞洠搴︼細鈽�

銆€銆€9. A 鏈彞琛ㄧず鐨勬槸鈥滈爯(y霉)娓€�锛屾晠閬告搰predict銆侱閬搁爡鐨刣iscover鐐哄共鎿鹃爡锛屽緸婕㈣獮鐨勮搴︿技涔庤寰楅€�锛屽嵆锛屸€滅爺绌剁櫦(f膩)鐝�(xi脿n)鈥︹€︹€�锛岀劧鑰�锛岃嫢瑾€滅櫦(f膩)鐝�(xi脿n)鈥�锛屽悗閭婄殑璩撹獮寰炲彞鍙兘浣跨敤涓€鑸従(xi脿n)鍦ㄦ檪锛屽鐧�(f膩)鐝�(xi脿n)浜嗕竴鍊嬩粈涔堣(gu墨)寰嬬瓑锛屼絾鏈彞鍚庨倞浣跨敤鐨勬槸灏囦締鏅�锛屾墍浠ュ彧鑳界悊瑙ｇ偤鈥滈爯(y霉)娓€�銆傞洠搴︼細鈽嗏槅

銆€銆€10. A 鏈姣旇純闆�锛� A閬搁爡鐨刟ssist琛ㄧず鈥滃公鍔┾€�锛孊閬搁爡鐨則rack琛ㄧず鈥滆窡韫も€�锛汣閬搁爡鐨剆ustain琛ㄧず鈥滅董鎸�锛屼娇鈥︹€︾辜绾�(x霉)娲讳笅鍘烩€濓紱D閬搁爡鐨刣ismiss琛ㄧず鈥滆В鏁�锛岃畵鈥︹€﹂洟闁嬧€�銆傚緸鍏ㄦ渚嗙湅锛屽悗闈富瑕佽瑳濡備綍缍寔浣忛€欎簺鐒″鍙鑰呭€戠殑绌�(w臎n)瀹氾紝涓嶅儏瑕佺郸浠栧€戝悆浣�锛岄倓瑕佽В姹轰粬鍊戝叾浠栦竴绯诲垪鐨勫晱椤�锛岄€欏氨鏆楃ず鍓嶉潰鐨勪富椤屽彞璎涚殑鏄公鍔╃劇瀹跺彲姝歌€�锛屾澶�锛屽緸鑸囧悕瑭瀙opulation鐨勬惌閰嶄締鐪嬶紝涔熷彧鏈堿閬搁爡鏈€鍚堥仼銆傞洠搴︼細鈽嗏槅鈽嗏槅鈽�

銆€銆€11. C 鏍规摎(j霉)椤屾剰锛屾湰鍙ユ槸璁撴鐨勬剰鎬�锛屸€滃嵆浣跨暥(d膩ng)浠栧€戞湁鍚冩湁浣忥紝浠栧€�?n猫i)鍖€绮懆顒氼剼?锛屾墍浠ラ伕鎿嘋閬搁爡鐨別ven銆傞洠搴︼細鈽嗏槅

銆€銆€12. B 鏈鐐鸿鍖鲸鏋愰銆傚洓鍊嬮伕闋呴兘鏈夆€滀綇鎴库€�銆佲€滀綇铏曗€濈殑鎰忔€濓紝浣咮閬搁爡鐨剆helter闄や簡琛ㄧず鈥滆棌韬檿鈥濅箣澶�锛岄倓鏈夆€滀繚璀�(h霉)鈥濈殑鎰忔€�锛岃€屼笅鏂囨槑椤湁姝ゅ惈缇�锛屾晠閬告搰B銆傞洠搴︼細鈽嗏槅鈽嗏槅

銆€銆€13. D 鏈鍚屾ǎ鐐鸿鍖鲸鏋愰锛屼富瑕佽鍗€(q奴)鍒咮閬搁爡stroll鍜孌閬搁爡wander銆係troll琛ㄧず鈥滈枒閫�锛屾偁闁戝湴鏁ｆ鈥�锛岃€寃ander鍓囪〃绀衡€滃緲寰�锛屼簜閫涒€濈殑鎰忔€濓紝寰堟槑椤�锛寃ander鏇寸鍚堥鎰�銆傞洠搴︼細鈽嗏槅

銆€銆€14. C 鏈彞琛ㄩ仈(d谩)璁撴锛屸€滈洊鐒惰ū澶氫汉鈥︹€�锛屼絾鏄€︹€︹€濓紝鍙互浣跨敤although/though锛屼絾閬搁爡涓苟鏈彁渚涢€欏叐鍊嬭锛屼絾鎴戝€戠煡閬搘hile涔熷彲浠ョ敤渚嗚〃閬�(d谩)although鐨勬剰鎬�锛屾晠閬告搰C閬搁爡鐨剋hile銆傞洠搴︼細鈽嗏槅

銆€銆€15. A 鏈涓昏鏄崁(q奴)鍒唋ife skills鍜宻urvival skills锛屽墠鑰呰〃绀衡€滅敓娲昏兘鍔涒€�锛屽悗鑰呰〃绀衡€滅敓瀛樻妧鑳解€濓紝鐢变簬鏂囩珷瑷庤珫鐒″鍙鑰呯殑鍩烘湰鐢熸椿鍟忛锛屾晠鎳�(y墨ng)閬告搰A閬搁爡銆傞洠搴︼細鈽嗏槅鈽�

銆€銆€16. A 鏈鐐鸿绲勬惌閰�銆俆urn around琛ㄧず鈥滆綁(zhu菐n)閬庤韩鈥濓紝turn on琛ㄧず鈥滄墦闁嬧€濈瓑鎰忔€�锛宼urn up琛ㄧず鈥滃嚭鐝�(xi脿n)鈥濈瓑鎰忔€濓紝turn over琛ㄧず鈥滅炕杞�(zhu菐n)鈥�銆傛湰鍙ユ剰鎬濇噳(y墨ng)瑭茬偤鈥滀粬鍊�?n猫i)鐙埼诡寖濠曞瘎杌勭爛娣栧啅绾︽棻绾愁寠鐫�?锛屼篃灏辨槸瑾皣鐢熸椿鈥滅炕杞�(zhu菐n)鈥濓紝鏁呴伕鎿嘇閬搁爡鐨則urn around銆傞洠搴︼細鈽嗏槅鈽嗏槅

銆€銆€17. B 鏈彞椤屾剰鐐衡€滃叏闈㈢殑瑕�(gu墨)鍔冣€�锛屾墍浠ョ敤B閬搁爡鐨刢omprehensive銆侫閬搁爡complex寮疯(di脿o)寰�(f霉)闆滄€�锛汣閬搁爡complementary寮疯(di脿o)浜掕鎬э紱D閬搁爡compensating寮疯(di脿o)瑁滃劅鎬�锛屾墍浠ュ潎涓嶅悎椤屾剰銆傞洠搴︼細鈽嗏槅鈽�

銆€銆€18. C 闆ｅ害锛氣槅

銆€銆€19. A 鏈鍜屼笂椤屼竴璧锋(g貌u)鎴愪竴鍊嬪彞鍨嬶細as sb. puts it锛屾剰鎬濈偤鈥滄濡傗€︹€﹁鐨勯偅妯ｂ€濄€傛晠18椤岄伕鎿嘋閬搁爡鐨刟s锛�19椤岄伕鎿嘇閬搁爡鐨刾uts銆傞洠搴︼細鈽�

銆€銆€20. D 鏈彞寮疯(di脿o)鍚勭ó瑷堝妰涓殑鍗�(xi茅)鍚�锛屾晠閬告搰D 閬搁爡鐨刢oordination銆侫閬搁爡鐨剆upervision鎰忔€濈偤鈥滅洠(ji膩n)鐫�锛岀鐞嗏€�锛孊閬搁爡鐨刴anipulation鎰忔€濈偤鈥滄搷绺扁€濓紝C閬搁爡鐨剅egulation鎰忔€濈偤鈥滆(di脿o)绡€(ji茅)锛屾牎婧�(zh菙n)鈥濓紝鍧囦笉鍚堥鎰�銆傞洠搴︼細鈽嗏槅鈽嗏槅

銆€銆€涓夈€佽│椤屽垎鏋愶細

銆€銆€鎳�(y墨ng)瑭茶锛屾湰骞村害鐨勨€滆嫳瑾炵煡璀樻噳(y墨ng)鐢ㄢ€濋闆ｅ害姣旇純閬╀腑锛岃垏2004銆�2005骞寸浉姣斿苟娌掓湁鎻愬崌闆ｅ害銆備笅琛ㄦ槸2002-2006骞粹€滆嫳瑾炵煡璀樻噳(y墨ng)鐢ㄢ€濋鐨勭浉闂�(gu膩n)姣旇純銆�

銆€銆€鍜屽線骞寸浉姣�锛�2006骞寸瘒骞呮笡灏�锛屼絾鍙ュ瓙闆ｅ害骞舵矑鏈夋彁楂�锛屾枃绔犵殑涓婚琛ㄨ堪涔熷緢娓呮櫚锛屼篃灏辨槸瑾紝鑰冪敓姣旇純瀹规槗寮勬噦鏂囩珷澶ч儴鍒嗗収(n猫i)瀹�銆備絾鏈変竴鍊嬫瘮杓冩槑椤殑璁婂寲灏辨槸锛岃鍖鲸鏋愰澧炲姞浜嗘暩(sh霉)閲忓拰闆ｅ害銆傞€欐ǎ灏遍渶瑕佽€冪敓涓嶅儏瑕佹槑鐧芥枃绔犵殑澶ч珨鍏�(n猫i)瀹�锛岄倓瑕佸湪绱�(x矛)绡€(ji茅)鍦版柟鏇寸簿婧�(zh菙n)鍦扮悊瑙ｅ師鏂囨剰鎬濓紝鐒跺悗閫氶亷瑭炲尟杈ㄦ瀽閬告搰鍑烘渶浣崇瓟妗�銆傞€欑劇鐤戠偤鑰冪敓鎻愬嚭浜嗘洿澶х殑鎸戞埌(zh脿n)銆備笅闈㈣垑绗�6椤岀偤渚嬭鏄庯細

銆€銆€Not everyone agrees on the numbers of Americans who are homeless. Estimates____6__ anywhere from 600,000 to 3 million.

銆€銆€[A] cover[B] change[C] range[D] differ

銆€銆€鏈灏遍渶瑕佽€冪敓浠旂窗(x矛)杈ㄦ瀽鍥涘€嬮伕闋呯殑鍚京锛岀劧鍚庣祼(ji茅)鍚堜笂涓嬫枃閫�(j矛n)琛岄伕鎿�銆傛噳(y墨ng)瑭茶锛孉銆丅銆丆銆丏鍥涘€嬮伕闋呭悗鍙互璺熼€欐ǎ鐨勭祼(ji茅)妲�(g貌u)锛歝hange / range / differ from A to B锛屽锛�

銆€銆€This newspaper covers everything domestic news to financial situation.

銆€銆€It鈥檚 hard to adapt oneself to the change from a student to a teacher.

銆€銆€There are 40 students in the class, with their age ranging from 25 to 35.

銆€銆€Opinions differ from person to person.

銆€銆€浣嗗緸涓婂洓鍙ュ彲浠ョ湅鍑�锛屽彧鏈塺ange from A to B閫欐ǎ鐨勭祼(ji茅)妲�(g貌u)鎵嶈〃绀轰粈涔堟澅瑗垮湪鏌愬€嬭寖鍦嶅収(n猫i)璁婂寲锛宑over寮疯(di脿o)瑕嗚搵闈㈢⿳锛宑hange寮疯(di脿o)鐙€鎱�(t脿i)璁婂寲锛宒iffer寮疯(di脿o)宸暟銆傝€屽師鏂囨槑椤彁鍒颁簡涓€鍊嬭寖鍦嶏細寰�60钀埌300钀�锛屽洜姝ゅ彧鑳介伕鎿噐ange銆�

Section II Reading Comprehension

銆€銆€Part A

銆€銆€Directions:

銆€銆€Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C, or D. Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1.(40 points)

銆€銆€Text 1

銆€銆€In spite of 鈥渆ndless talk of difference,鈥� American society is an amazing machine for homogenizing people. This is 鈥渢he democratizing uniformity of dress and discourse, and the casualness and absence of consumption 鈥渓(f膩)aunched by the 19th 鈥揷entury department stores that offered 鈥榲ast arrays of goods in an elegant atmosphere. Instead of intimate shops catering to a knowledgeable elite.鈥� these were stores 鈥渁nyone could enter, regardless of class or background. This turned shopping into a public and democratic act.鈥� The mass media, advertising and sports are other forces for homogenization.

銆€銆€Immigrants are quickly fitting into this common culture, which may not be altogether elevating but is hardly poisonous. Writing for the National Immigration Forum, Gregory Rodriguez reports that today鈥檚 immigration is neither at unprecedented level nor resistant to assimilation. In 1998 immigrants were 9.8 percent of population; in 1900, 13.6 percent. In the 10 years prior to 1990, 3.1 immigrants arrived for every 1,000 residents; in the 10 years prior to 1890, 9.2 for every 1,000. Now, consider three indices of assimilation------language, home ownership and intermarriage.

銆€銆€The 1990 Census revealed that 鈥渁 majority of immigrants from each of the fifteen most common countries of origin spoke English 鈥渨ell鈥� or 鈥渧ery well鈥� after ten years of residence.鈥� The children of immigrants tend to be bilingual and proficient in English. 鈥淏y the third generation, the original language is lost in the majority of immigrant families.鈥� Hence the description of America as a graveyard鈥� for language. By 1996 foreign-born immigrants who had arrive before 1970 had a home ownership rate of 75.6 percent, higher than the 69.8 percent rate among native-born Americans.

銆€銆€Foreign-born Asians and Hispanics 鈥渉ave higher rates of intermarriage than do U.S-born whites and blacks.鈥� By the third generation, one third of Hispanic women are married to non-Hispanics, and 41 percent of Asian-American women are married to non-Asians.

銆€銆€Rodriguez not that children in remote villages around world are fans of superstars like Amold Schwarzenegger and Garth Brooks, yet 鈥渟ome Americans fear that immigrant living within the United States remain somehow immune to the nation鈥檚 assimilative power.鈥�

銆€銆€Are there divisive issues and pockets of seething in America? Indeed. It is big enough to have a bit of everything. But particularly when viewed against America鈥檚 turbulent past, today鈥檚 social induces suggest a dark and deteriorating social environment.

銆€銆€21. The word 鈥渉omogenizing鈥� (Line 2, Paragraph 1) most probably means

銆€銆€A. identifying B. associating C. assimilating D. monopolizing

銆€銆€22. According to the author, the department stores of the 19th century

銆€銆€A.played a role in the spread of popular culture.

銆€銆€B.became intimate shops for common consumers.

銆€銆€C.satisfied the needs of a knowledgeable elite.

銆€銆€D.owed its emergence to the culture of consumption.

銆€銆€23. The text suggests that immigrants now in the U.S.

銆€銆€A.are resistant to homogenization.

銆€銆€B.exert a great influence on American culture.

銆€銆€C.are hardly a threat to the common culture.

銆€銆€D.constitute the majority of the population.

銆€銆€24. Why are Amold Schwarzenegger and Garth Brooks mentioned in Paragraph 5?

銆€銆€A. To prove their popularity around the world.

銆€銆€B. To reveal the public鈥檚 fear of immigrants.

銆€銆€C. To give examples of successful immigrants.

銆€銆€D. To show the powerful influence of American culture.

銆€銆€25. In the author鈥檚 opinion, the absorption of immigrants into American society is

銆€銆€A. rewardingB. successfulC. fruitlessD. harmful

銆€銆€Text 2

銆€銆€Stratford-on-Avon, as we all know, has only one industry鈥擶illiam Shakespeare鈥攂ut there are two distinctly separate and increasingly hostile branches. There is the Royal Shakespeare Company (ASC), which presents superb productions of the plays at the Shakespeare Memorial Theatre on the Avon. And there are the townsfolk who largely live off the tourists who come, not to see the plays, but to look at Anne Hathaway鈥檚 Cottage, Shakespeare鈥檚 birthplace and the other sights.

銆€銆€The worthy residents of Stratford doubt that the theatre adds a penny to their revenue. They frankly dislike the RSC鈥檚 actors, them with their long hair and beards and sandals and noisiness. It鈥檚 all deliciously ironic when you consider that Shakespeare, who earns their living, was himself an actor (with a beard) and did his share of noise-making.

銆€銆€The tourist streams are not entirely separate. The sightseers who come by bus- and often take in Warwick Castle and Blenheim Palace on the side鈥攄on鈥檛 usually see the plays, and some of them are even surprised to find a theatre in Stratford. However, the playgoers do manage a little sight-seeing along with their playgoing. It is the playgoers, the ESC contends, who bring in much of the town鈥檚 revenue because they spend the night (some of them four or five nights) pouring cash into the hotels and restaurants. The sightseers can take in everything and get out of town by nightfall.

銆€銆€The townsfolk don鈥檛 see it this way and local council does not contribute directly to the subsidy of the Royal Shakespeare Company. Stratford cries poor traditionally. Nevertheless every hotel in town seems to be adding a new wing or cocktail lounge. Hilton is building its own hotel there, which you may be sure will be decorated with Hamlet Hamburger Bars, the Lear Lounge, the Banquo Banqueting Room, and so forth, and will be very expensive.

銆€銆€Anyway, the townsfolk can鈥檛 understand why the Royal Shakespeare Company needs a subsidy. (The theatre has broken attendance records for three years in a row. Last year its 1,431 seats were 94 percent occupied all year long and this year they鈥檒l do better.) The reason, of course, is that costs have rocketed and ticket prices have stayed low.

銆€銆€It would be a shame to raise prices too much because it would drive away the young people who are Stratford鈥檚 most attractive clientele. They come entirely for the plays, not the sights. They all seem to look alike (though they come from all over)---lean, pointed, dedicated faces, wearing jeans and sandals, eating their buns and bedding down for the night on the flagstones outside the theatre to buy the 20 seats and 80 standing鈥攔oom tickets held for the sleepers and sold to them when the box office opens at 10:30 a.m.

銆€銆€Text 3

銆€銆€When prehistoric man arrived in new parts of the world, something strange happened to the large animals. They suddenly became extinct. Smaller species survived. The large, slow-growing animals were easy game, and were quickly hunted to extinction. Now something similar could be happening in the oceans.

銆€銆€That the seas are being overfished has been known for years. What researchers such as Ransom Myers and Boris Worm have shown is just how fast things are changing. They have looked at half a century of data from fisheries around the world. Their methods do not attempt to estimate the actual biomass (the amount of living biological matter) of fish species in particular parts of the ocean, but rather changes in that biomass over time. According to their latest paper published in Nature, the biomass of large predators (animals that kill and eat other animals) in a new fishery is reduced on average by 80% within 15 years of the start of exploitation. In some long-fished areas, it has halved again since then.

銆€銆€Dr Worm acknowledges that the figures are conservative. One reason for this is that fishing technology has improved. Today's vessels can find their prey using satellites and sonar, which were not available 50 years ago. That means a higher proportion of what is in the sea is being caught, so the real difference between present and past is likely to be worse than the one recorded by changes in catch sizes. In the early days, too, longlines would have been more saturated with fish. Some individuals would therefore not have been caught, since no baited hooks would have been available to trap them, leading to an underestimate of fish stocks in the past. Furthermore, in the early days of longline fishing, a lot of fish were lost to sharks after they had been hooked. That is no longer a problem, because there are fewer sharks around now.

銆€銆€Dr Myers and Dr Worm argue that their work gives a correct baseline, which future management efforts must take into account. They believe the data support an idea current among marine biologists, that of the "shifting baseline". The notion is that people have failed to detect the massive changes which have happened in the ocean because they have been looking back only a relatively short time into the past. That matters because theory suggests that the maximum sustainable yield that can be cropped from a fishery comes when the biomass of a target species is about 50% of its original levels. Most fisheries are well below that, which is a bad way to do business.

銆€銆€31. The extinction of large prehistoric animals is noted to suggest that

銆€銆€A. large animal were vulnerable to the changing environment.

銆€銆€B. small species survived as large animals disappeared.

銆€銆€C. large sea animals may face the same threat today.

銆€銆€D. Slow-growing fish outlive fast-growing ones

銆€銆€32. We can infer from Dr Myers and Dr. Worm鈥檚 paper that

銆€銆€A. the stock of large predators in some old fisheries has reduced by 90%.

銆€銆€B. there are only half as many fisheries as there were 15 years ago.

銆€銆€C. the catch sizes in new fisheries are only 20% of the original amount.

銆€銆€D. the number of larger predators dropped faster in new fisheries than in the old.

銆€銆€33. By saying these figures are conservative (Line 1, paragraph 3), Dr Worm means that

銆€銆€A. fishing technology has improved rapidly

銆€銆€B. then catch-sizes are actually smaller then recorded

銆€銆€C. the marine biomass has suffered a greater loss

銆€銆€D. the data collected so far are out of date.

銆€銆€34. Dr Myers and other researchers hold that

銆€銆€A. people should look for a baseline that can鈥檛 work for a longer time.

銆€銆€B. fisheries should keep the yield below 50% of the biomass

銆€銆€C. the ocean biomass should restored its original level.

銆€銆€D. people should adjust the fishing baseline to changing situation

銆€銆€35. The author seems to be mainly concerned with most fisheries鈥�

銆€銆€A.management efficiency

銆€銆€B.biomass level

銆€銆€C.catch-size limits

銆€銆€D.technological application.

銆€銆€Text 4

銆€銆€Many things make people think artists are weird and the weirdest may be this: artists' only job is to explore emotions, and yet they choose to focus on the ones that feel bad.

銆€銆€This wasn't always so. The earliest forms of art, like painting and music, are those best suited for expressing joy. But somewhere in the 19th century, more artists began seeing happiness as insipid, phony or, worst of all, boring as we went from Wordsworth's daffodils to Baudelaire's flowers of evil.

銆€銆€You could argue that art became more skeptical of happiness because modern times have seen such misery. But it's not as if earlier times didn't know perpetual war, disaster and the massacre of innocents. The reason, in fact, may be just the opposite: there is too much damn happiness in the world today.

銆€銆€After all, what is the one modern form of expression almost completely dedicated to depicting happiness? Advertising. The rise of anti-happy art almost exactly tracks the emergence of mass media, and with it, a commercial culture in which happiness is not just an ideal but an ideology.

銆€銆€People in earlier eras were surrounded by reminders of misery. They worked until exhausted, lived with few protections and died young. In the West, before mass communication and literacy, the most powerful mass medium was the church, which reminded worshippers that their souls were in peril and that they would someday be meat for worms. Given all this, they did not exactly need their art to be a bummer too.

銆€銆€Today the messages your average Westerner is bombarded with are not religious but commercial, and forever happy. Fast-food eaters, news anchors, text messengers, all smiling, smiling. Our magazines feature beaming celebrities and happy families in perfect homes. And since these messages have an agenda--to lure us to open our wallets to make the very idea of happiness seem unreliable. "Celebrate!" commanded the ads for the arthritis drug Celebrex, before we found out it could increase the risk of heart attacks.

銆€銆€What we forget--what our economy depends on is forgetting--is that happiness is more than pleasure without pain. The things that bring the greatest joy carry the greatest potential for loss and disappointment. Today, surrounded by promises of easy happiness, we need someone to tell us as religion once did, Memento mori: remember that you will die, that everything ends, and that happiness comes not in denying this but in living with it. It's a message even more bitter than a clove cigarette, yet, somehow, a breath of fresh air.

銆€銆€36.By citing the example of poets Wordsworth and Baudelaire, the author intends to show that

銆€銆€A. Poetry is not as expressive of joy as painting or music.

銆€銆€B. Art grow out of both positive and negative feeling.

銆€銆€C. Poets today are less skeptical of happiness.

銆€銆€D. Artist have changed their focus of interest.

銆€銆€37. The word 鈥渂ummer鈥� (Line 5. paragraph 5) most probably means something

銆€銆€A. religiousB. unpleasant C. entertaining D. commercial

銆€銆€38.In the author鈥檚 opinion, advertising

銆€銆€A.emerges in the wake of the anti-happy part.

銆€銆€B.is a cause of disappointment for the general peer

銆€銆€C.replace the church as a major source of information

銆€銆€D.creates an illusion of happiness rather than happiness itself.

銆€銆€39.We can learn from the last paragraph that the author believes

銆€銆€A.Happiness more often than not ends in sadness.

銆€銆€B.The anti-happy art is distasteful by refreshing.

銆€銆€C.Misery should be enjoyed rather than denied.

銆€銆€D.The anti-happy art flourishes when economy booms

銆€銆€40.Which of the following is true of the text?

銆€銆€A.Religion once functioned as a reminder of misery.

銆€銆€B.Art provides a balance between expectation and reality.

銆€銆€C.People feel disappointed at the realities of morality.

銆€銆€D.mass media are inclined to cover disasters and deaths.

銆€銆€Part B

銆€銆€Directions:

銆€銆€In the following text, some sentences have been removed. For Questions 41-45, choose the most suitable one from the list A- G to fit into each of numbered blanks. There are two extra choices, which do not fit in any of the blanks. Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)

銆€銆€On the north bank of the Ohio River sits Evansville, Ind., home of David Williams, 52, and of a riverboat casino where gambling games are played. During several years of gambling in that casino, Williams, a state auditor earning $35,000 a year, lost approximately $175,000. He had never gambled before the casino sent him a coupon for $20 worth of gambling.

銆€銆€He visited the casino, lost the $20 and left. On his second visit he lost $800. The casino issued to him, as a good customer, a Fun Card, which when used in the casino earns points for meals and drinks, and enables the casino to track the user's gambling activities. For Williams, these activities become what he calls electronic morphine. (41)______________. In 1997 he lost $21,000 to one slot machine in two days. In March 1997 he lost $72,186. He sometimes played two slot machines at a time, all night, until the boat locked at 5 a.m., then went back aboard when the casino opened at 9 a.m. Now he is suing the casino, charging that it should have refused his patronage because it knew he was addicted. It did know he had a problem.

銆€銆€In March 1998, a friend of Williams's got him involuntarily confined to a treatment center for addictions, and wrote to inform the casino of Williams's gamblers. The casino included a photo of Williams among those of banned gamblers, and wrote to him a鈥� cease admissions鈥� letter noting the medical/psychological nature of problem gambling behaviors, the letter said that before being readmitted to the patronizing the casino would pose no threat to his safety have to his safety or well-being. (42) ______________.

銆€銆€The Wall Street Journal reports that the casino has 20 signs warning: 鈥淓njoy the fun ... and always bet with your head, not over it鈥�. Every entrance ticket lists a toll-free number for counseling from the Indiana Department of Mental Health. Nevertheless, Williams's suit charges that the casino, knowing he was 鈥渉elplessly addicted to gambling鈥�, intentionally worked to 鈥漧ove鈥� him to 鈥渆ngage in conduct against his will鈥� well. (43) ______________.

銆€銆€The fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) says 鈥減athological gambling鈥� involves persistent, recurring and uncontrollable pursuit less of money than of taking risks in quest of a windfall, (44) ______________.Pushed by science, or what claims to be science, society is reclassifying what once were considered character flaws or moral failings as personality disorders akin to physical disabilities. (45) ______________.

銆€銆€Forty-four states have lotteries, 29 have casinos, and most of these states are to varying degrees dependent on --you might say --addicted to--revenues from wagering. And since the first Internet gambling site was created in 1995, competition for gamblers' dollars has become intense. The Oct. 28 issue of NEWSWEEK reported that 2 million gamblers patronize 1,800 virtual casinos every week. With $3.5 billion being lost on Internet wagers this year, gambling has passed pornography as the Web's most profitable business.

銆€銆€(A). Although no such evidence was presented, the casino's marketing department continued to pepper him with mailings. And he entered the casino and used his Fun Card without being detected.

銆€銆€(B). It is unclear what luring was required, given his compulsive behavior. And in what sense was his will operative?

銆€銆€(C). By the time he had lost $5,000 he said to himself that if he could get back to even, he would quit. One night he won $5,500, but he did not quit.

銆€銆€(D). Gambling has been a common feature of American life forever, but for a long time it was broadly considered a sin, or a social disease. Now it is a social policy: the most important and aggressive promoter of gambling in America is government.

銆€銆€(E). David Williams鈥檚 suit should trouble this gambling nation. But don鈥檛 bet on it.

銆€銆€(F). It is worrisome that society is medicalizing more and more behavioral problems, often defining as addictions what earlier, sterner generations explained as weakness of will.

銆€銆€(G). The anonymous, lonely, undistracted nature of online gambling is especially conductive to compulsive behavior. But even if the government knew how to move against Internet gambling, what would be its grounds for doing so?

銆€銆€Part C

銆€銆€Directions:

銆€銆€Read the following text carefully and then translate the underlined segments into Chinese. Our translation should be written neatly on ANSWER SHEET2. (10 points)

銆€銆€Is it true that the American intellectual is rejected and considered of no account in his society? I am going to suggest that it is not true. Father Bruckbergen told part of the story when he observed that it is the intellectuals who have rejected Americans. But they have done more than that. They have grown dissatisfied with the role of intellectual. It is they, not Americans, who have become anti-intellectual.

銆€銆€First, the object of our study pleads for definition. What is an intellectual? (46) I shall define him as an individual who has elected as his primary duty and pleasure in life the activity of thinking in Socratic(铇囨牸鎷夊簳) way about moral problems .He explores such problem consciously, articulately, and frankly, first by asking factual questions, then by asking moral questions, finally by suggesting action which seems appropriate in the light of the factual and moral information which he has obtained. (47) His function is analogous to that of a judge, who must accept the obligation of revealing in as obvious a matter as possible the course of reasoning which led him to his decision.

銆€銆€This definition excludes many individuals usually referred to as intellectuals --- the average scientist for one 48) I have excluded him because, while his accomplishments may contribute to the solution of moral problems, he has not been charged with the task of approaching any but the factual aspects of those problems. Like other human beings, he encounters moral issues even in everyday performance of his routine duties.--- he is not supposed to cook his experiments, manufacture evidence, or doctor his reports. (49) But his primary task is not to think about the moral code, which governs his activity, any more than a businessman is expected to dedicate his energies to an exploration of rules of conduct in business. During most of his walking life he will take his code for granted, as the businessman takes his ethics.

銆€銆€The definition also excludes the majority of factors, despite the fact that teaching has traditionally been the method whereby many intellectuals earn their living (50) They may teach very well and more than earn their salaries, but most of them make little or no independent reflections on human problems which involve moral judgment .This description even fits the majority eminent scholars .鈥淏eing learned in some branch of human knowledge in one thing, living in public and industrious thoughts,鈥� as Emerson would say ,鈥渋s something else.鈥�

涓€銆佺附楂旇⿻鍍�

銆€銆€1.鍏�(n猫i)瀹�

銆€銆€閫欐鑰冭│鐨勫洓绡囨枃绔犲垎鍒ユ秹鍙婁簡缇庡湅鏂囧寲涓殑鍚屽寲(homogenizing/assimilation)銆佽帋澹瘮浜炴晠灞呯殑鏃呮父銆佹捣娲嬮瓪椤炵殑閬庨噺鎹曟拡鍜屾唫鎰佺殑钘濊(sh霉)(the art of unhappiness)绛夊収(n猫i)瀹癸紝閮芥槸鏅傛晥鎬ц純寮风殑鍟忛锛屽挨鍏舵槸鍚庡叐绡�銆傞洠搴︽寜寰炴槗鍒伴洠鐨勯爢搴忔帓鍒�锛岀涓€绡囨渶瀹规槗锛岀鍥涚瘒鏈€闆ｃ€�

銆€銆€2.鏂囩珷渚嗘簮

銆€銆€閫欎簺鏂囩珷鏃㈢劧鏅傛晥鎬ц純寮�锛屼竴鑸氨灞簬鏅傛枃銆傛垜閬庡幓璎涜鏅傚挤瑾�(di脿o)骞剧ó瑕侀柋璁€鐨勯洔蹇�锛屽The Economist, Newsweek, Time绛夛紝骞朵笖鎸囧嚭鍏朵腑400-500瑭炴垨杓冩槗鍒敼鐐哄姝ら暦搴︾殑鏂囩珷鏄柋璁€閲嶉粸锛岄€欎簺瑾硶鍦ㄩ€欐鑰冭│涓張寰楀埌浜嗛璀�銆傚锛岀涓夌瘒閬歌嚜The Economist 2003骞�5鏈�15鏃ョ殑鏂囩珷Ocean鈥檚 eleventh hour?锛屽師鏂囧叡679瑭烇紝缍�(j墨ng)閬庡埅鏀硅畩?y艒u)姒崥鍤俽鐨勬枃绔�銆傜鍥涚瘒閬歌嚜Time 2005骞�1鏈�17鏃ョ殑鏂囩珷The Art of Unhappiness锛屽師鏂囧叡841瑭�锛岀稉(j墨ng)閬庡埅鏀硅畩?y艒u)姒崥鍤俽鐨勬枃绔犮€�

銆€銆€3.鐢熻鑸囬洠鍙�

銆€銆€鏂囩珷涓瓨鍦ㄥ€嬪垾鐢熻锛屼絾鐢熻绺介噺鏈秴缍憋紝鑰屼笖閫欎簺鐢熻鏍规摎(j霉)涓婁笅鏂囧彲浠ユ帹鍑烘剰鎬�锛屽苟涓嶅奖闊跨悊瑙ｅ拰鍋氶銆傞洠鍙ヤ笉澶�锛岀涓夌瘒鏂囩珷澶氫簺銆�

銆€銆€浜�銆佽│椤屽垎鏋�

銆€銆€1.绺借⿻鍍�

銆€銆€闁辫畝閮ㄥ垎闆ｅ害鑸�2005骞村熀鏈寔骞�锛屼絾绗洓绡囨枃绔犲亸闆�锛屼富瑕佹槸娑夊強浜烘枃鐨勫収(n猫i)瀹硅純澶�銆傚亣濡傚钩鍧囧垎鐐�50鍒嗗乏鍙筹紝閭ｄ箞閫欎竴閮ㄥ垎鐨勫钩鍧囧緱鍒嗙磩鐐�18-20鍒�銆�

銆€銆€2.椤屽瀷

銆€銆€閫欐鑰冭│椤屽瀷骞朵笉寰�(f霉)闆滐紝涓昏娑夊強瑭炲尟椤�(21銆�37)銆佸彞瀛愭剰鎬濋(33)銆佷緥璀夐(24銆�31銆�36)銆佹厠(t脿i)搴﹂(25)銆佺窗(x矛)绡€(ji茅)椤�(濡�22)绛�锛屽叾涓緥璀夐鍜岀窗(x矛)绡€(ji茅)椤岃純澶氾紝闇€瑕佺窗(x矛)蹇冮柋璁€鍜屽畾浣嶅師鏂�銆傛渶鍚庝竴绡囨枃绔犳槸涓€绡囦汉鏂囨枃绔�锛岄柋璁€鏅傝娉ㄦ剰浣滆€呯殑鎱�(t脿i)搴�銆備互绗竴绡囨枃绔犵偤渚�銆傜涓€绡囨枃绔犵殑绛旀鐐篊ACDA銆傚叿楂斿仛椤屾€濊矾濡備笅锛�

銆€銆€绗竴椤�锛�21椤�锛屾槸鍊嬭鍖锛屾牴鎿�(j霉)鍘熸枃棣栧彞鐨勪笂涓嬫枃灏辫兘纰哄畾绛旀鏄疌锛屽洜鐐哄師鏂囬鍙ラ枊濮嬬殑in spite of琛ㄧず杞�(zhu菐n)鎶橀棞(gu膩n)绯�锛屽氨鏄homogenizing鑸囧墠闈㈢殑 difference鍦ㄤ笂涓嬫枃涓(g貌u)鎴愬弽缇╄锛屽湪鍥涘€嬮伕闋呬腑鑳借垏difference妲�(g貌u)鎴愬弽缇╄鐨勫彧鏈塧ssimilate銆傜暥(d膩ng)鐒跺緸鍚庢枃涔熻兘鐪嬪嚭鏂囩珷涓殑閲嶈瑭瀉ssimilate鏄痟omogenizing鐨勫悓缇╄銆傛湁鐨勫悓瀛�(xu茅)鏍规摎(j霉)瑭炴牴homo琛ㄧず鈥滅浉鍚屸€濈殑鎰忔€濋伕C涔熸槸灏嶇殑銆�37椤岀殑bummer鏍规摎(j霉)涓婃枃鐨勫皪浜庘€滀笉骞糕€濈殑鎻忓锛屼篃鑳介伕鍒癇鈥滀护浜轰笉蹇殑鈥�銆�

銆€銆€绗簩绋锛�22椤�锛屾槸绱�(x矛)绡€(ji茅)椤�锛屾牴鎿�(j霉)鍏朵腑鐨勯棞(gu膩n)閸佃department stores of the 19th century瀹氫綅涓€娈�锛屽啀鏍规摎(j霉)鍘熸枃鎺掗櫎鍙互鎺ㄥ嚭A鏄皪鐨�銆傛敞鎰廌椤涘€掍簡鍥犳灉闂�(gu膩n)绯�銆�

銆€銆€绗笁椤�锛�23椤�锛屾槸鍊嬬啊鍠殑鎺ㄧ悊椤�銆傚晱椤屽晱鏂囦腑鏆楃ず鐝�(xi脿n)鍦ㄧ編鍦嬬殑绉绘皯濡備綍锛�2娈甸鍙ョ殑鐗规畩绲�(ji茅)妲�(g貌u)not鈥ut灏卞憡瑷翠簡鎴戝€戠従(xi脿n)鍦ㄧ編鍦嬬Щ姘戠殑鐗归粸锛氳兘铻嶅叆鍏卞悓鏂囧寲(common culture)锛岃〃閬�(d谩)閫欎竴鎰忔€濈殑閬搁爡鍙湁C銆�

銆€銆€绗洓椤�锛�24椤�锛岀瓟妗堟瘮杓冩槑椤�锛屾噳(y墨ng)瑭叉槸D锛屼篃灏辨槸瑾垑閫欏叐鍊嬩汉鐐轰緥鏄偤浜嗚鏄庣編鍦嬫枃鍖栫殑宸ㄥぇ褰遍熆銆�

銆€銆€绗洓绡囨枃绔犺純闆ｇ悊瑙ｏ紝鍏跺ぇ鎰忔槸鈥滅編鍦嬩汉涓€鍚戣拷姹傚垢绂�銆傞亷鍘讳汉鍊戔€樼疮寰楃瓔鐤插姏鐩�锛岀敓娲诲咕鐒′繚闅�锛屽勾绱€(j矛)杓曡紩灏卞懡鍠粌娉夌殑鎮茶嫤澧冨湴鈥欙紝鑰屼粖澶╅潰灏嶈憲鈥滃揩妯傚緱璁撲汉鐒℃硶蹇嶅彈鐨勫晢妤�(y猫)鏂囧寲鈥濇檪锛屽嵒鐧�(f膩)鐝�(xi脿n)鎶撳埌鎵嬬殑骞哥浠や汉闅辩磩涓嶅揩銆傜暥(d膩ng)浜哄€戠祩浜庤璧凤細骞哥閬�(yu菐n)涓嶆鏄矑鏈夌棝鑻︾殑蹇▊鏅�锛屾墠鐧�(f膩)鐝�(xi脿n)鎲傛剚鐨勮棟琛�(sh霉)鐩＄鑻︽線锛屽嵒甯朵締涓€鑲′护鍏堕牠鑵︽竻閱掔殑娓呮柊姘ｆ伅鈥�銆傞亷鍘绘湁瀹楁暀鍛婅ù鎴戝€�?n猫i)鎿炶儊鎭嶉仴顑戭墰缂冪绾宠櫋I(y猫)鏂囧寲鍗诲彧瀹ｅ偝骞哥锛屼綔鑰呭皪姝や笉婊�銆傛湁浜涘晱椤屾彁绀哄涓嬶細

銆€銆€36椤屾槸鍊嬩緥璀夐锛屽晱鎻愬埌鍏╀綅瑭╀汉鐨勭洰浣曞湪銆傚師鏂囪垑閫欏叐浣嶈┅浜烘槸鐐轰簡瑾槑钘濊(sh霉)瀹剁殑杞�(zhu菐n)璁婏細閬庡幓鎻忚堪骞哥锛屽悗渚嗘弿杩颁笉骞�銆傚洜姝鐐烘纰虹瓟妗�銆�

銆€銆€37椤屽凡鍦ㄥ墠闈㈣閬�銆�

銆€銆€38椤�锛岀敱鍘熸枃鍙煡锛屽浠婄殑寤ｅ憡绲︿汉閫犳垚骞哥鐨勫够瑕猴紝鑰岄潪鐪熺殑骞哥锛岄偅涔圖鐐烘纰虹瓟妗�銆�

銆€銆€39椤�锛屾牴鎿�(j霉)鏂囩珷鏈€鍚庡彲浠ユ帹鍑轰綔鑰呰寰楅偅浜涘鎻氫笉骞哥殑钘濊(sh霉)浠や汉涓嶅揩(distasteful)锛屼絾鏄护浜烘湁娓呮柊涔嬫劅(refreshing)锛屽洜姝ょ瓟妗堢偤C銆�

銆€銆€40椤�锛岀敱鏂囦腑鍙煡锛屽畻鏁欏湪閬庡幓鎻愰啋浜哄€戣嫤闆ｇ殑瀛樺湪锛屽浠婂鍌充笉骞哥殑钘濊(sh霉)璧疯憲鍚屾ǎ鐨勪綔鐢�銆侫瑾埌浜嗗畻鏁欑殑閫欎竴浣滅敤锛岀偤姝ｇ⒑绛旀銆�

銆€銆€鐢变笂闈㈢殑瑙ｈ鍙互鐪嬪嚭锛屼粖骞寸殑闁辫畝鐞嗚В椤岀殑闆ｅ害鑸囧幓骞村樊涓嶅锛屽彧瑕佽兘澶犳妸鎴戝€戦亷鍘昏瑳鐨勪竴浜涘仛椤屾柟娉曞悆閫�锛屽啀鍔犱笂杓冩墡瀵︾殑瑭炲尟鍩虹(ch菙)鍜岄柋璁€鑳藉姏锛屽緱涓€鍊嬭嚜宸辨豢鎰忕殑鍒�?j菒n)?sh霉)涓嶆槸澶洠銆傜澶у闁辫畝閮ㄥ垎鍜屾暣鍊�鑰冪爺鑻辫獮鑰冨嚭鐞嗘兂鐨勫垎?j菒n)?sh霉)锛�

鑰冪爺鏂伴鍨嬭垏缈昏涓昏瑳

銆€銆€鍖椾含鏂拌埅閬撳(xu茅)鏍″洓绱氳伣鍔涗富璎�锛屼竷閬镐簲鏂伴鍨嬩富璎涳紝鑻辫獮瑾炶█鏂囧(xu茅)灏堟キ(y猫)纰╁＋锛屽寳浜浕褰卞(xu茅)闄㈣嫳瑾炶瑳甯€傚師鏂版澅鏂瑰洓绱氳伣鍔涜绋嬩富璎�锛屽彟鍏间换澶栫爺绀鹃爡鐩法杓�锛岀櫦(f膩)琛ㄣ€婃枃瀛楋細鎬濈董鐨勯彙鍍忋€�銆併€婁腑鍦嬬炕璀爺绌剁殑缇庡(xu茅)鎯呯祼(ji茅)銆嬬瓑浣滃搧锛屽嚭鐗堛€婅嫳瑾炲悕瑷€璜鸿獮闆嗛對銆�銆併€婂ぇ瀛�(xu茅)鑻辫獮涓€鑰冮€氾細鍥�銆佸叚绱氬彛瑾炪€嬬瓑灏堣憲锛屾暀瀛�(xu茅)瑾�(r猫n)鐪熻矤(f霉)璨�(z茅)锛屾巿瑾叉収鍙ｅ悙鐜�锛屽杽浜庣附绲�(ji茅)姝哥磵锛屽厖婊挎縺鎯�銆�

銆€銆€涓€銆佷粖骞�7閬�5椤屽瀷鐨勬暣楂斿垎鏋�

銆€銆€绺界殑渚嗚锛屼粖骞寸殑7閬�5椤屽瀷姣斿幓骞寸啊鍠�銆備粖骞寸殑鑰冮鏄棞(gu膩n)浜庘€滆抄鍗氣€濋€欏€嬬ぞ鏈冨晱椤岀殑瑷庤珫鐨�锛屾枃绔犲緸鐢熷嫊楫槑鐨勫渚嬪紩鍏�锛岀辜鑰岃珖鍒板悇澶у獟楂斿皪閫欏€嬪晱椤岀殑鍙嶆噳(y墨ng)鍜岃◣璜栵紝鏄潪甯搁鏄庣殑瑗挎柟鍫卞垔闆滃織鐨勬枃绔犵殑棰�(f膿ng)鏍�锛屽皪浜庣稉(j墨ng)甯搁柋璁€鑻辨枃鍫卞垔闆滃織鐨勫悓瀛�(xu茅)锛岄€欐ǎ鐨勬枃绔犲叾瀵﹀苟涓嶉洠涓婃墜銆�

銆€銆€鍚屾檪锛屼笉鍙唱(zh矛)鐤戠殑鏄�锛屼粖骞寸殑鑰冮涓嶅儏鍍呭挤瑾�(di脿o)浜嗚€冪敓鐨勮鍖噺鍟忛锛岃€屼笖寰炴洿娣变竴姝ュ挤瑾�(di脿o)浜嗚€冪敓灏嶄簬瑗挎柟鏂囧寲鐨勭悊瑙�銆傛枃涓璫asino涓€瑭�锛屽氨甯舵湁楫槑鐨勮タ鏂规枃鍖栫壒寰�锛岃〃绀衡€滆抄鍫粹€�銆傚緢澶氬悓瀛�(xu茅)鐔熸倝gamble涓€瑭烇紝浣嗘槸灏嶄簬casino骞朵笉瑕嬪緱浜嗚В銆傞€欏€嬪柈瑭炲師鏈槸鎰忓ぇ鍒╄獮锛屾槸 casa鐨勫皬瀛楀熬鈥滄埧灞嬧€�锛岃€屽叾鏈韩涔熶締鑷簬鎷変竵瑾� casa锛屾剰鎬濇槸鈥滄潙鑸�銆佸皬灞�銆佽寘灞�?锛佸紛閽囬釜?锛岄€欏€嬭灏堥杸鐢ㄤ締鎸囦竴鎵€閯�(xi膩ng)闁撴埧灞�锛屽悗渚嗛€愭几婕旇畩鎴愮敤渚嗘寚涓€鍊嬬ぞ浜よ仛鏈冨牬鎵€锛屼汉鍊戝彲浠ュ湪閭ｉ噷璺宠垶銆佽伣闊虫▊鍜岃抄鍗氥€傝€岄毃钁楁檪浠ｇ櫦(f膩)灞�锛岃抄鍗氶€欑ó濞涙▊鐨勫湴浣嶄技涔庡凡鍦ㄥ叾浠栧妯備箣涓�锛屼簬鏄畠闁嬪鏈変簡鈥滆抄鍫粹€濈殑鍚京銆傝€岀従(xi脿n)鍦�锛岄€欏€嬫剰澶у埄瑭炵殑閫欎簺鎰忕京閮藉凡琚€熺敤鍒拌嫳瑾炰腑锛涒€滅ぞ浜よ仛鏈冨牬鎵€鈥濋€欏堡鎰忔€濆湪18涓栫磤(j矛)棣栨琚閷勪笅渚�锛屸€滆抄鍫粹€濈殑鍚京鍦�1851骞磋棣栨瑷橀寗涓嬩締銆傚湪瑗挎柟锛屾(bi膩o)鏈塩asino鐨勫湴鏂瑰咕涔庢瘡鍊嬪ぇ鍩庡競閮介毃铏曞彲瑕�锛岃€宑asino閫欐ǎ鐨勮抄鍗氬牬鎵€绲︿汉鍊戝付渚嗙殑鍟忛涔熻秺渚嗚秺鏄庨’锛屼簬鏄氨鏈変簡闂�(gu膩n)浜巆asino鐨勮◣璜�銆傞毃钁楀洜鐗圭恫(w菐ng)鐨勫嚭鐝�(xi脿n)锛屾柟渚垮揩鎹风殑鍦ㄧ窔casino涔熻秺渚嗚秺鐩涜锛屽湪google涓婃悳绱竴涓嬧€渃asino鈥濓紝浣犲彲浠ユ壘鍒扮劇鏁�(sh霉)鐨刢asino online銆傚皪浜庤€冪敓渚嗚锛屽(xu茅)缈�(x铆)鑻辫獮鐨勫悓鏅傜啛鎮夎嫳瑾炲湅瀹剁殑鏂囧寲鏄潪甯搁噸瑕佺殑涓€鏂归潰锛岄€欎篃鏄粖骞磋€冮鍑洪鐨勪竴鍊嬪緢鏄庨’鐨勮定鍕�锛屽笇鏈涗笅骞村害瑕佽€冪爺鐨勫悓瀛�(xu茅)娉ㄦ剰銆�

銆€銆€闄ゆ浠ュ锛屼粖骞寸殑鑰冮閭勬槸瑕佹彁閱掑悓瀛�(xu茅)鍊戦棞(gu膩n)浜庡仛椤岀殑鍏烽珨鐨勬椹熴€傜涓€姝ワ細璁€棣栧彞锛屾槑澶ф剰銆傚紕鏄庣櫧鏂囩珷鐨勫ぇ鎰�锛屽湪绛旈鐨勬檪鍊欑墷鐗㈡墸浣忔枃绔犵殑涓绘棬锛屽績涓鏋滆兘鐗㈣鏂囩珷涓绘棬锛岀瓟椤屾檪灏辫兘鍋氬埌鏈夋涓嶇磰銆傜浜屾锛氳閬搁爡锛屾壘鐗瑰緛銆傛枃绔犲ぇ鎰忔槑浜嗗悗锛屼竴瀹氳娌変笅蹇冧締浠旂窗(x矛)瑙€瀵熼伕闋�锛屽崈钀笉鑳介Μ铏庯紝鎶婃枃绔犵殑閵滄帴鍜岄€ｈ搏鐨勬墜娈�锛屾瘮鏂硅浜虹ū浠ｈ銆佹寚绀轰唬瑭�銆侀€ｆ帴瑭�銆佸京(f霉)鐝�(xi脿n)鍚岀従(xi脿n)閫欎簺瑭炶獮妯�(bi膩o)瑷樺嚭渚嗐€傜涓夋锛氱湅鍓嶅悗锛屾姄绶氱储銆傝瀵熷畬閬搁爡鍚庯紝鍐嶅洖鍒板師鏂囧畾浣�锛屾姄浣忕┖鍓嶇┖鍚庣殑鍙ュ瓙锛岄帠瀹氱洰妯�(bi膩o)绛旀鐨勭壒寰�銆傜鍥涙锛氭煡鍏ㄦ枃锛屽皪绛旀銆傞€欎竴姊濇寚鐨勬槸鏈€鍚庣敤浠ｅ叆娉曢€氳畝鍏ㄦ枃锛屾鏌ョ瓟妗堟槸涓嶆槸寰堝悎鐞�銆傚鏋滃悓瀛�(xu茅)鍊戣兘閬电収閫欏洓姝ョ瓟椤岋紝閭ｄ箞鍏跺鏂囩珷寰堝鏄撴姄浣忕窔绱締绛旈銆�

銆€銆€鍙﹀锛岀敱浜�2005骞磋€冪侗涓婂叕甯冪殑鏂伴鍨嬫湁涓夌ó锛屾墍浠ュ緢澶氬悓瀛�(xu茅)鍦ㄥ京(f霉)缈�(x铆)婧�(zh菙n)鍌欐檪灏辫尗鐒朵笉鐭ユ墍鎺�锛屽叾瀵﹂€欎笁绋鍨嬭鍒板簳鏄惉璁婁笉闆㈠叾瀹楃殑锛岄兘鏄€冨療鏂囩珷鐨勯姕鎺ヨ垏閫ｈ搏锛岃€屼竷閬镐簲椤屽瀷鏄€欎笁绋鍨嬬殑鍩烘湰椤屽瀷锛屽仛濂戒簡涓冮伕浜旈鍨�锛屽叾瀹冨叐绋篃杩庡垉鑰岃В锛岄€欎竴榛炴垜涓婅鐨勬檪鍊欎篃鏇剧稉(j墨ng)瑾埌閬庯紝鎵€浠ヤ粖骞寸辜绾�(x霉)鑰冨療涓冮伕浜�锛屼笉鎳�(y墨ng)瑭插嚭涔庡悓瀛�(xu茅)鍊戠殑鎰忔枡涔嬪銆�

銆€銆€浜�銆佷粖骞�7閬�5椤屽瀷鐨勫叿楂斿垎鏋�

銆€銆€鎷垮埌鏂囩珷浠ュ悗锛屽厛涓嶈鎬ヨ憲鍋�锛岃鍏堣瀵熶竴涓�?锛熺函?1鑰冩涓�锛�42鑰冩灏撅紝43鑰冩钀�锛�44鑰冩涓�锛�45鑰冩灏俱€�

銆€銆€1銆佽畝棣栧彞锛屾槑澶ф剰

銆€銆€鏂囩珷绗竴娈电殑鏂囧瓧绨″柈锛岀敤涓€鍊嬪渚嬪紩鍑轰簡鏂囩珷鐨勮◣璜栧収(n猫i)瀹�銆傞娈垫彁鍒帮細鈥淲illiams鍦ㄨ抄鍫撮噷璩簡濂藉咕骞达紝浠栨瘡骞撮€氶亷璩崥璩洪€�(j矛n)$35锛�000锛� 浣嗘槸杓�?sh霉)鑸昏啴s鏄�$175锛�000銆備粬闁嬪璩崥鏄洜鐐鸿抄鍫存浘缍�(j墨ng)閫佺郸浠栦竴寮靛児鍊�$20鐨勫劒(y艒u)鎯犲埜?锛佺剻鑻婇粻@锛屾枃绔犳彁鍒扮殑鑲畾鏄棞(gu膩n)浜庤抄鍗氱殑鍟忛锛岃€屼笖Williams鍦ㄨ抄鍫撮噷璐忓皯杓稿锛岄偅涔堣抄鍗氶’鐒朵笉鏄欢濂戒簨鎯�锛岀郸Williams甯朵締鐨勭棝鑻�銆傝€學illiams闁嬪璩崥鏄洜鐐洪偅寮靛劒(y艒u)鎯犲埜锛岄偅涔堥’绀烘槸璩牬鏈夋剰瑾樺皫(d菐o)浜哤illiams閫欑ó鎰忓織钖勫急鐨勪汉閫�(j矛n)琛岃抄鍗氥€傝珖?w霉)鎾♀偓鍗氱殑鏂规柟闈㈤潰锛屽挨鍏舵槸璩崥鐨勫嵄瀹虫€ф槸鏂囩珷鐨勮◣璜栭噸榛�锛岃€冪敓鍦ㄥ仛椤屽墠涓€瀹氳蹇冧腑鏈夋暩(sh霉)銆�

銆€銆€2銆佽閬搁爡锛屾壘鐗瑰緛

銆€銆€鍙互鍏堟巸鎻忎竴涓嬮伕闋�锛屾妸姣忓€嬮伕闋呬腑鐨勭壒寰佽锛屽鏁�(sh霉)瑭�銆侀€ｆ帴瑭�銆佷唬瑭炵瓑鍔冨嚭渚嗐€傚悓鏅�锛岃鏄庣⒑姣忓€嬮伕闋呯殑澶ф剰銆�

銆€銆€(A).Although no such evidence was presented, the casino's marketing department continued to pepper him with mailings. And he entered the casino and used his Fun Card without being detected.

銆€銆€娉ㄦ剰鍒拌綁(zhu菐n)鎶橀€ｈalthough锛岄偅涔堣〃鏄庢閬搁爡濡傛灉鍏ラ伕锛屽拰鍓嶆枃蹇呯劧瀛樺湪杞�(zhu菐n)鎶橀棞(gu膩n)绯�銆傝€宻uch evidence涓€瑭炶〃鏄庢閬搁爡濡傛灉鍏ラ伕锛屽墠鏂囧繀鐒舵彁鍒版煇绋甧vidence銆傚彟澶栵紝涓€瀹氳娉ㄦ剰the casino's marketing department continued to pepper him with mailings涓€鍙ヤ腑鐨刢ontinue涓€瑭�銆傞€欏彞瑭辩殑鎰忔€濇槸瑾€渃asino鐨勫競鍫撮儴绻肩簩(x霉)绲︿粬澶ч噺瀵俊鈥濓紝閭ｄ箞寰堟槑椤�锛屽鏋滄閬搁爡鍏ラ伕锛屽墠鏂囧繀鐒舵浘缍�(j墨ng)鎻愬埌casino绲︿粬瀵俊銆傜暥(d膩ng)鐒�锛岃┎閬搁爡鐨勬渶鍚庝竴鍙ユ彁鍒颁簡his Fun Card閫欏€嬪皥鏈夊悕瑭�锛岄偅涔堟閬搁爡濡傛灉鍏ラ伕锛屽墠鏂囪偗瀹氭浘缍�(j墨ng)鎻愬埌閬嶧un Card锛屽苟灏嶄箣鍋氬嚭閬庣浉鎳�(y墨ng)浠嬬垂銆�

銆€銆€(B). It is unclear what luring was required, given his compulsive behavior. And in what sense was his will operative?

銆€銆€閫欏€嬮伕闋呭緢鐭紝鐢卞叐鍊嬪晱鍙ョ祫鎴�銆傞伕闋呰鈥滃皻涓嶆竻妤氭槸浠€涔堟ǎ瀛愮殑瑾樻儜灏�(d菐o)鑷翠簡浠栫殑鎵€璎備笉鎯呮効鐨勮鐐猴紝涔熷皻涓嶆竻妤氫粬鑷繁鐨勬剰鎰跨┒绔熷浣�?锛佸簢鎹庤岸x闋呯煭锛屽彲浠ュ緢娓呮鐨勭煡閬撻伕闋呯殑澶ф剰銆傞偅涔堬紝濡傛灉姝ら伕闋呭叆閬�锛屽墠鏂囪偗瀹氭浘缍�(j墨ng)鎻愬埌鏈変粈涔堣獦鎯戝皫(d菐o)鑷翠簡浠栫殑鎵€璎備笉鎯呮効鐨勮鐐�锛屼篃鑲畾鏇剧稉(j墨ng)鎻愬埌閬庢墍璎傜殑浠栬嚜宸辩殑鎰忔効銆傞€欎簺瑭為兘鍙互浣滅偤妯�(bi膩o)蹇楄鍔冨嚭渚嗐€�

銆€銆€(C).By the time he had lost $5,000 he said to himself that if he could get back to even, he would quit. One night he won $5,500, but he did not quit.

銆€銆€閫欏€嬮伕闋呬腑鏈€鏄庨’鐨勭壒寰佽鐣�(d膩ng)鐒舵槸鏁�(sh霉)瑭�锛岃€冪敓闇€瑕佹妸鏁�(sh霉)瑭炲叏閮ㄥ妰涓嬩締銆傞伕闋呮剰鐐衡€滃湪浠栬几?sh霉)?5锛�000鐨勬檪鍊欙紝浠栧皪鑷繁瑾�锛屽鏋滄妸杓�?sh霉)鑸诲唴A鍥炰締浠栧氨鏀舵墜浜嗐€備竴鍊嬫櫄涓婁粬纰哄璐忎簡$5锛�500锛屼絾鏄粬骞舵矑鏈夋敹鎵嬧€�銆傚緢鏄庨’锛岄€欏€嬮伕闋呬粛鐒舵彁鍒癢illiams璩崥鐨勯亷绋�銆�

銆€銆€(D).Gambling has been a common feature of American life forever, but for a long time it was broadly considered a sin, or a social disease. Now it is a social policy: the most important and aggressive promoter of gambling in America is government.

銆€銆€閫欏€嬮伕闋呮彁鍒帮細鈥滆抄鍗氱従(xi脿n)鍦ㄦ槸缇庡湅浜虹敓娲讳腑寰堝父瑕嬬殑浜嬫儏浜嗭紝浣嗘槸寰堥暦鏅傞枔涓€渚�锛岃抄鍗氬叾瀵﹂兘琚鐐烘槸鐘姜鎴栫ぞ鏈冨晱椤�銆傚叾瀵︾編鍦嬭抄鍗氱殑鏈€閲嶈鍜屾渶绌嶆サ鐨勬帹閫�(j矛n)鑰呮槸缇庡湅鏀垮簻鈥�銆傞€欏€嬮伕闋呬腑鐩存帴鎻愬埌浜嗙編鍦嬫斂搴滃湪缇庡湅浜鸿抄鍗氱繏(x铆)鎱ｄ腑鎵€鎵紨鐨勮鑹�锛岄€欓粸瑕佺墷瑷樸€�

銆€銆€(E).David Williams鈥檚 suit should trouble this gambling nation. But don鈥檛 bet on it.

銆€銆€閫欏€嬮伕闋呭彧鏈変竴鍙ヨ┍锛屾彁鍒扳€淲illiams鐨勫€嬫鍙兘鏈冪郸閫欏€嬭抄鍗氭垚鎬х殑鍦嬪?gu墨)顫嗙缁�?锛岀郸浜哄€戠殑璩崥鐢熸动甯朵締楹荤叐锛屼絾鏄篃涓嶄竴瀹氣€�銆傚叾瀵︽瘮杓冩槑椤殑鏄�锛岄€欏€嬮伕闋呭爆浜庣附绲�(ji茅)椤炲瀷鐨勫彞瀛�锛岀附绲�(ji茅)瑾槑Williams鐨勬渚嬬郸缇庡湅绀炬渻甯朵締鐨勫彲鑳界祼(ji茅)鏋溿€傝€屼笖鑰冪敓閭勮娉ㄦ剰鍒皌rouble this gambling nation涓璽his閫欏€嬫寚绀轰唬瑭�锛岄€欏€嬭瑾炶〃鏄�锛屽鏋滈€欏€嬮伕闋呭叆閬革紝鍓嶉潰鑲畾鏇剧稉(j墨ng)鎻忚堪閬庨€欏€嬪湅瀹剁殑璩崥鎯呮硜銆�

銆€銆€(F). It is worrisome that society is medicalizing more and more behavioral problems, often defining as addictions what earlier, sterner generations explained as weakness of will.

銆€銆€閫欏€嬮伕闋呰鈥滀护浜轰笉瀹夌殑鏄紝绀炬渻鐝�(xi脿n)鍦ㄦ鍦ㄧ敤閱�(y墨)瀛�(xu茅)鏂规硶铏曠悊瓒婁締瓒婂鐨勯€欐ǎ鐨勮鐐哄晱椤�锛屽挨鍏舵槸灏嶄互鍓嶇殑鏉辫タ涓婄櫘鐨勫晱椤岋紝鏇村姞涓嶅姘ｇ殑瑾紝鍏跺閫欐槸涓€鍊嬫剰蹇楀姏钖勫急鐨勫晱椤屸€�銆傛敞鎰弇edicalize涓€瑭烇紝琛ㄧず鈥滅敤閱�(y墨)瀛�(xu茅)鏂规硶铏曠悊(闈為啱(y墨)瀛�(xu茅)鍟忛绛�)鈥�銆傞倓瑕佹敞鎰忕殑鏄紝濡傛灉閫欏€嬮伕闋呭叆閬�锛屽墠鏂囪偗瀹氭彁鍒伴亷鐢ㄩ啱(y墨)瀛�(xu茅)鏂规硶渚嗚檿鐞嗚鐐哄晱椤岋紝鑰岄€欐ǎ鐨勯啱(y墨)娌绘柟娉曡秺渚嗚秺鐩涜锛屾墍浠ユ墠浠や汉涓嶅畨銆�

銆€銆€(G). The anonymous, lonely, undistracted nature of online gambling is especially conductive to compulsive behavior. But even if the government knew how to move against Internet gambling, what would be its grounds for doing so?

銆€銆€閫欏€嬮伕闋呮彁鍒颁簡online gambling(鍦ㄧ窔璩崥)鐨勫晱椤�銆傞偅涔堜粈涔堟槸鍦ㄧ窔璩崥锛熷湪绶氳抄鍗氱殑鍗卞鏄粈涔堬紵濡傛灉閫欏€嬮伕闋呭叆閬�锛屽墠闈㈡噳(y墨ng)瑭茶鏈変粙绱�銆�

銆€銆€3銆佺湅鍓嶅悗锛屾姄绶氱储

銆€銆€41绌猴細

銆€銆€姝ょ┖鐐烘涓銆�

銆€銆€绌哄墠鏂囧瓧瑾殑鏄疻illliams鐨勮抄鍗氱稉(j墨ng)姝�銆傛彁鍒颁簡涓€浜涙暩(sh霉)瑭�锛屼綔鐐虹壒寰佽锛岃€冪敓鎳�(y墨ng)瑭叉敞鎰忋€傚垵娆¤抄鍗�锛屼粬杓�?sh霉)琚呴€熲偓鍫磋磮閫佺殑20缇庡厓鍎�(y艒u)鎯犲埜銆傜浜屾璩崥锛岃几?sh霉)琚�?00缇庡厓銆傜劧鍚庤抄鍫村張鎼炴椿鍕�锛岄€佷粬涓€寮礔un Card锛屽彲浠ョ敤閫欏嫉鍗″湪璩牬璩崥鏅傚埛鍗″悆鍏嶈不椁�锛屽枬鍏嶈不椋叉枡锛屽悓鏅備篃瑷橀寗浠栫殑璩崥娲诲嫊銆傝€屼笖Williams鍚庝締瑾�(r猫n)鐐洪€欎簺娲诲嫊绨＄洿灏辨槸鈥滈浕瀛愬棊鍟♀€�銆�

銆€銆€绌哄悗鏂囧瓧绻肩簩(x霉)瑾猈illiams鐨勮抄鍗氭椿鍕�锛屽悓鏅備篃鎻愬埌浜嗕竴浜涘垪鏁�(sh霉)瀛�銆傞偅涔堟牴鎿�(j霉)鍚岀従(xi脿n)寰�(f霉)鐝�(xi脿n)鍘熷墖锛屾鐒＄枒鍟�锛�41绌轰篃鏈冩彁鍒癢illiams鐨勮抄鍗氱稉(j墨ng)姝凤紝鑰屼笖寰堝彲鑳藉嚭鐝�(xi脿n)鏁�(sh霉)瀛�銆傚緢鏄庨’锛屽彧鏈夐伕闋匔绗﹀悎锛屾墍浠�41绌哄緢蹇伕C銆�

銆€銆€42绌猴細

銆€銆€姝ょ┖鐐烘灏鹃銆�

銆€銆€灏嶄簬娈靛熬椤岋紝鐣�(d膩ng)鐒惰鐗㈢墷鎶撲綇绌哄墠鏂囧瓧?锛熸定鎷旀窎鐥斿铂?锛學illiams鐨勪竴鍊嬫湅鍙嬪悗渚嗘妸浠栭€佸埌浜嗕竴鍊嬫不鐧備腑蹇冨幓娌荤檪璩櫘锛岄倓瀵俊绲asino鍛婄煡閫欎欢浜嬫儏銆侰asino浣滃嚭鐨勫弽鎳�(y墨ng)鏄紝鎶奧illiams鍒楀叆绂佹璩崥浜哄摗鐨勫悕鍠�锛屽悓鏅傜郸浠栧淇¤鏄庤抄鍗氬皪韬績鐨勫嵄瀹�锛屼俊涓倓鎻愬埌锛屽湪Williams閲嶆柊鍏ユ渻涔嬪墠锛岃抄鍫翠笉鏈冨皪鍏朵汉韬病鐢�(ch菐n)鍋氬嚭濞佽剠銆傛瘮杓冩槑椤殑鏄�锛岀┖鍓嶆枃瀛楀弽寰�(f霉)鎻愬埌浜嗗淇′竴浜�锛岄伕闋呬腑鍙湁A鎻愬埌浜嗏€渃asino鐨勫競鍫撮儴绻肩簩(x霉)绲︿粬澶ч噺瀵俊鈥�銆�42绌洪伕A銆�

銆€銆€43绌猴細

銆€銆€姝ょ┖鐐烘钀介銆�

銆€銆€绌哄墠鏂囧瓧鎻愬埌鈥淲illiams鎻愬嚭鎸囨帶锛孋asino鏄庢槑鐭ラ亾浠栫劇鍙晳钘ョ殑杩锋垁涓婅抄鍗�锛岄倓鏁呮剰寮曡獦浠栧緸浜嬮仌鑳屼粬鎰忔効鐨勬椿鍕曗€濄€傛敞鎰忕┖鍓嶆枃瀛椾腑鐨� 鈥渓(f膩)ure鈥濆拰鈥渨ill鈥濆叐瑭�锛屽湪閫欓噷鍒嗗垾琛ㄧず鈥滆獦鎯戔€濆拰鈥滄剰鎰库€�?锛熷繉榉�?y墨ng)瑭插緢蹇兘鎯冲埌閬搁爡B锛屽墠闈㈡彁鍒伴亷锛屽鏋淏閬搁爡鍏ラ伕锛屽墠鏂囪偗瀹氭浘缍�(j墨ng)鎻愬埌鏈変粈涔堣獦鎯戝皫(d菐o)鑷翠簡浠栫殑鎵€璎備笉鎯呮効鐨勮鐐�锛屼篃鑲畾鏇剧稉(j墨ng)鎻愬埌閬庢墍璎傜殑浠栬嚜宸辩殑鎰忔効锛屾墍浠�43绌洪伕B銆�

銆€銆€44绌猴細

銆€銆€姝ょ┖鐐烘涓銆�

銆€銆€绌哄墠鏂囧瓧鎻愬埌涓€瀹堕啱(y墨)瀛�(xu茅)闆滃織鎻愬埌鐨勨€滅梾鎱�(t脿i)璩崥鈥濈殑姒傚康锛屽緸閱�(y墨)瀛�(xu茅)瑙掑害渚嗚珖璩崥銆傚鏋滀粩绱�(x矛)鍒嗘瀽閬庨伕闋咃紝鑰冪敓鎳�(y墨ng)瑭插緢蹇兘鎯冲埌閬搁爡F锛屽墠闈㈠凡缍�(j墨ng)鎻愬埌閬�锛屽鏋淔閬搁爡鍏ラ伕锛屽墠鏂囪偗瀹氭彁鍒伴亷鐢ㄩ啱(y墨)瀛�(xu茅)鏂规硶渚嗚檿鐞嗘墍璎傝鐐哄晱椤�锛屽璩崥锛岃€岄€欐ǎ鐨勯啱(y墨)娌绘柟娉曡秺渚嗚秺鐩涜锛屾墍浠ユ墠浠や汉涓嶅畨锛岄偅涔團閬搁爡鏀惧湪閫欓噷鏈€鍚堥仼锛屾墍浠�44绌洪伕F銆�

銆€銆€45绌猴細

銆€銆€姝ょ┖鐐烘灏鹃銆�

銆€銆€绌哄墠鎻愬埌锛屸€滅敱浜庣瀛�(xu茅)鐨勬帹鍕�锛岀ぞ鏈冩鍦ㄦ妸閫欑ó琛岀偤閲嶆柊姝搁銆� 鏇剧稉(j墨ng)琚獚(r猫n)鐐烘€ф牸缂洪櫡鍜岄亾寰锋晽澹�锛岀従(xi脿n)鍦ㄥ凡缍�(j墨ng)琚妰鐐轰簡鐥呮厠(t脿i)浜烘牸鐨勮寖鐤�锛岃垏鐢熺悊娈橀殰椤炰技鈥�銆�

銆€銆€绌哄悗鏂囧瓧鎻愬埌锛岀編鍦嬫湁44鍊嬪窞鏈夊僵绁ㄦ椿鍕�锛�29鍊嬪窞鏈夎抄鍫达紝鑰屼笖澶у鏁�(sh霉)宸炲湪涓嶅悓绋嬪害涓婁緷闈犻€欎簺璩崥娲诲嫊鐛插緱绋呮敹銆傜辜鑰屽紩鍏ヤ簡缍�(w菐ng)涓婅抄鍗氱殑姒傚康锛岀涓€鍊嬭抄鍗氱恫(w菐ng)鐨勫壍(chu脿ng)绔嬫檪闁擄紝缍�(w菐ng)涓婅抄鍗氱殑鐧�(f膩)灞曠瓑绛�銆�

銆€銆€鐝�(xi脿n)鍦ㄩ倓鍓╀笅D/E/G涓夊€嬮伕闋�銆傛垜鍊戜締瑙€瀵熶竴涓嬮€欎笁鍊嬮伕闋�銆�

銆€銆€鍓嶉潰鎻愬埌閬�锛� G鎻愬埌鐨勬槸online gambling(鍦ㄧ窔璩崥)鐨勫晱椤�銆傞偅涔堜粈涔堟槸鍦ㄧ窔璩崥锛熷湪绶氳抄鍗氱殑鍗卞鏄粈涔�锛熷鏋淕鍏ラ伕锛屽墠闈㈡噳(y墨ng)瑭茶鏈変粙绱广€傚緢鏄庨’锛�45绌哄湪绌哄悗鎵嶅垵娆″紩鍏ョ恫(w菐ng)涓婅抄鍗氱殑姒傚康锛屾墍浠�45绌轰笉鑳介伕G锛孏鎳�(y墨ng)瑭插湪鏂囩珷鏈€鍚庝竴娈靛悗闈㈠嚭鐝�(xi脿n)姣旇純鍚堥仼銆�

銆€銆€E鎻愬埌Williams鐨勫€嬫鍙兘鏈冪郸閫欏€嬭抄鍗氭垚鎬х殑鍦嬪?gu墨)顫嗙缁婃噣顑榦浜哄€戠殑璩崥鐢熸动甯朵締楹荤叐锛屼絾鏄篃涓嶄竴瀹�銆傚鏋滈€欏€嬮伕闋呭叆閬�锛屽墠闈㈣偗瀹氭浘缍�(j墨ng)鎻忚堪閬庨€欏€嬪湅瀹剁殑璩崥鎯呮硜銆傚緢鏄庨’锛岄€欏€嬪湅瀹剁殑璩崥鎯呮硜锛屾瘮濡傛湁姣忓€嬪窞鐨勮抄鍗氱媭娉佺瓑绛夊晱椤屾槸鍦�45绌虹┖鍚庢彁鍒扮殑锛孍閬搁爡鍑虹従(xi脿n)鍦ㄦ枃绔犳渶鍚庢墠鍚堥仼锛屾墍浠�45绌轰笉鑳介伕E銆�

銆€銆€D鐩存帴鎻愬埌浜嗙編鍦嬫斂搴滃湪缇庡湅浜鸿抄鍗氱繏(x铆)鎱ｄ腑鎵€鎵紨鐨勮鑹�銆傝€�45绌虹┖鍚庢枃瀛楁彁鍒颁簡鏀垮簻涔嬫墍浠ラ€欐ǎ鍋氫富瑕佹槸鍥犵偤瑕佸緸璩崥娲诲嫊涓彇寰楃▍鏀�锛屾墍浠閬搁爡鎵夸笂鍟熶笅锛�45绌烘噳(y墨ng)瑭查伕D銆�

銆€銆€4銆佸療鍏ㄦ枃锛屽皪绛旀

銆€銆€鎶婇伕闋呬唬閫�(j矛n)鍘�锛岀湅鐪嬫槸涓嶆槸鍚堥仼銆傞€欎竴姝ヤ富瑕佹槸鐪嬫剰鎬濇槸鍚︾浉閫�锛屾槸鍚﹂€欐槸涓€绡囧畬鏁寸殑鏂囩珷銆傛枃绔犵殑绲�(ji茅)妲�(g貌u)鍜岃剤绲�(lu貌)鏄惁娓呮銆�

銆€銆€鏈枃鏄竴绡囧緢鍏稿瀷鐨勫牨鍒婇洔蹇楄⿻璜栨枃绔�锛屼互浜嬩緥鎻愬嚭璜栭粸锛屼互鍚勬柟濯掗珨鐨勮⿻璜栧睍闁嬭珫璀夈€�

銆€銆€绺界殑渚嗚锛屾枃绔犻洠搴︿笉鏄緢澶э紝涓昏鏄姄浣忎富鏃�锛屾妸鎻＄窔绱�锛屼繚鎸佹竻閱掔殑闋叇鍜屾晱閵崇殑鎬濈董銆傚笇鏈涘ぇ瀹惰€冨嚭渚嗗ソ鎴愮妇锛屼篃甯屾湜澶у鑳藉閫�(j矛n)鍏ヨ嚜宸辩殑鐞嗘兂瀛�(xu茅)鏍�銆�

鑰冪爺缈昏涓昏瑳

銆€銆€鍖椾含甯寖澶у(xu茅)缈昏瀛�(xu茅)纰╁＋锛岃嫳瑾炲壇鏁欐巿锛�20骞寸殑鑻辫獮鏁欏(xu茅)鑸囩炕璀�缍�(j墨ng)椹�锛屽娆¤瑭曠偤鍎�(y艒u)绉€鏁欏斧銆傚嚭鐗堣憲銆佽浣滃崄浣欓儴锛屾摂(d膩n)浠婚亷鏂拌彲绀俱€併€婅嫳瑾炰笘鐣屻€嬬壒绱勬挵绋夸汉鍜屽鏍′汉锛屽湪銆婁腑鍦嬬炕璀€嬬瓑鍦嬪绱氬皥妤�(y猫)闆滃織涓婄櫦(f膩)琛ㄧ殑璜栨枃鍦ㄥ(xu茅)琛�(sh霉)鐣屽紩璧峰挤鐑堝弽闊�銆�1997骞撮枊濮嬪緸浜嬭€冪爺杓斿皫(d菐o)锛屽皪鑰冪爺鑻辫獮鏈夋繁鍏ョ崹鍒扮殑鐮旂┒骞剁崹鍓�(chu脿ng)鈥滃洓姝ュ畾浣嶇炕璀硶鈥濓紝寰楀埌瀛�(xu茅)鐢熼珮搴﹁獚(r猫n)鍙�銆�

銆€銆€涓€銆佺湡椤岃垏鍙冭€冭鏂囷細

銆€銆€46. I shall define him as an individual /who has elected /as his primary duty and pleasure in life /the activity of thinking in Socratic(铇囨牸鎷夊簳) way /about moral problems.

銆€銆€銆斿弮鑰冭鏂囥€曟垜鏈冩妸鐭ヨ瓨鍒嗗瓙瀹氱京鐐洪€欐ǎ鐨勪汉锛氫粬鎶婄敤铇囨牸鎷夊簳鏂瑰紡鎬濊€冮亾寰峰晱椤屼綔鐐轰汉鐢熺殑涓昏浠诲嫏(w霉)鍜屾▊瓒�銆�

銆€銆€47.His function is analogous to that of a judge, who must accept the obligation of revealing in as obvious a matter as possible the course of reasoning which led him to his decision.

銆€銆€銆斿弮鑰冭鏂囥€曠煡璀樺垎瀛愮殑浣滅敤鑸囨硶瀹樼浉浼硷紝浠栧繀闋堟帴鍙椾竴绋京鍕�(w霉)锛岄偅灏辨槸鍦ㄧ洝鍙兘娓呮鐨勪簨鎯呬腑鎻ず灏�(d菐o)鑷村叾鍋氬嚭姹哄畾鐨勬帹鐞嗛亷绋�銆�

銆€銆€48.I have excluded him /because, (while his accomplishments may contribute to the solution of moral problems, )he has not been charges with the task /of approaching any but the factual aspects of those problems.

銆€銆€銆斿弮鑰冭鏂囥€曟垜涔嬫墍浠ユ妸鏅€氱瀛�(xu茅)瀹舵帓闄ゅ湪澶栵紝鏄洜鐐虹洝绠′粬鐨勬垚灏卞彲鑳芥湁鍔╀簬瑙ｆ焙閬撳痉鍟忛锛屼絾浠栭倓娌掓壙鎿�(d膩n)璧风爺绌堕亾寰峰晱椤屼簨瀵︽柟闈互澶栫殑浠讳綍璨�(z茅)浠�銆�

銆€銆€49. But his primary task is not to think about the moral code, /which governs his activity, /any more than a businessman is expected /to dedicate his energies to an exploration of rules of conduct in business.

銆€銆€銆斿弮鑰冭鏂囥€曚絾鏄�锛屾櫘閫氱瀛�(xu茅)瀹剁殑涓昏浠诲嫏(w霉)骞堕潪鎬濊€冩寚灏�(d菐o)鍏惰鐐虹殑閬撳痉瑕�(gu墨)鑼�锛屾濡傛垜鍊戝苟涓嶆寚鏈涘晢浜烘妸绮惧姏鎶曞叆鍒板晢妤�(y猫)琛岀偤鐨勬帰绱竴妯ｃ€�

銆€銆€50. They may teach very well /and more than earn their salaries, /but most of them make little or no independent reflections on human problems /which involve moral judgment.

銆€銆€銆斿弮鑰冭鏂囥€曠煡璀樺垎瀛愬彲鑳藉緢鏈冩暀鏇�锛岃€屼笖涓嶅儏鍍呮槸鎺欏伐璩�锛屼絾鏄粬鍊戝ぇ閮ㄥ垎浜哄皪娑夊強閬撳痉鍒ゆ柗鐨勪汉椤炲晱椤屽緢灏戞垨鑰呮牴鏈笉閫�(j矛n)琛岀崹绔嬫€濊€�銆�

銆€銆€浜�銆侀粸瑭曪細

銆€銆€绺界殑渚嗚瑳锛�2006骞寸殑缈昏闆ｅ害閬╀腑锛岃垏杩戝咕骞寸殑缈昏椤屾矑鏈夊お澶у崁(q奴)鍒ャ€備笅闈㈡垜鍊戝叿楂旂湅涓€鐪嬩粖骞寸殑閲嶉粸銆佽€冮粸鍜岄洠榛烇細

銆€銆€1.浠ｈ姣忛亾椤岄兘鏈�

銆€銆€2.瀹氳獮寰炲彞鍙湁绗�48椤屾矑鏈�

銆€銆€3.璩撹獮鍚庣疆杓冨

銆€銆€46椤宔lected鐨勮硴瑾瀟he activity of thinking

銆€銆€47椤宺evealing鐨勮硴瑾瀟he course of reasoning

銆€銆€4.鑰冮粸閲嶇従(xi脿n)杓冨

銆€銆€46椤岄噷鐨刣efine鈥s鏇剧稉(j墨ng)鍦�2003骞村簳64椤岃€冮亷

銆€銆€46椤屽拰47椤岄噷鐨勮硴瑾炲悗缃湪2003骞村簳65椤岃€冮亷

銆€銆€47椤岀殑reasoning閫欏€嬭鍒嗗垾鍦�1997骞村簳75椤�銆�2003骞村簳62椤岃€冮亷

銆€銆€48椤岀殑while寮曞皫(d菐o)璁撴鐙€瑾炲緸鍙ュ湪1999骞寸71椤岃€冮亷

銆€銆€49椤岀殑govern鍜宑onduct鍏╁€嬭閮藉湪2002骞寸64椤岃€冮亷

銆€銆€4.鐢熻杓冨皯銆佸嫊瑭炵煭瑾炶純澶�

銆€銆€鍞竴鏈夐洠搴︾殑瑭炴槸47椤岀殑analogous(鐩镐技鐨�锛岄浼肩殑)(analogy鐨勬淳鐢熻)

銆€銆€48椤屾湁鍕曡鐭獮contribute to(鏈夊姪浜�)銆乥e charged with(鎿�(d膩n)璨�(f霉)鈥﹁铂(z茅)浠�)

銆€銆€49椤屾湁鍕曡鐭獮dedicate to(鎶�(鏅傞枔銆佺簿鍔涚瓑)鐢ㄤ簬)

銆€銆€50椤屾湁鍕曡鐭獮make reflections on(鎬濊€�)

銆€銆€5.鏂扮殑鑰冮粸

銆€銆€48椤岀殑but=except(闄も€︿互澶�)

銆€銆€49椤岀殑not鈥ny more than(涓嶁€︼紝姝ｅ鈥︿笉鈥︿竴妯�)

銆€銆€50椤岀殑more than(涓嶅儏鍍�)

Section III Writing

銆€銆€Part A

銆€銆€51. Directions:

銆€銆€You want to contribute to Project Hope by offering financial aid to a child in a remote area. Write a letter to the department concerned, asking them to help find a candidate. You should specify what kind of child you want to help and how you will carry out your plan.

銆€銆€Write your letter with no less than 100 words. Write it on ANSWER SHEET 2. Do not sign your name at the end of the letter; use Li Ming instead. You do not need to write the address. (10 points)

銆€銆€Part B

銆€銆€52. Directions:

銆€銆€Study the following photos carefully and write an essay of 160~200 words in which you should

銆€銆€1.describe the photos briefly,

銆€銆€2.interpret the social phenomenon reflected by them, and

銆€銆€3.give your point of view.

銆€銆€鏈夊叐骞呭湒鐗�锛屽湒1 鎶婂磭鎷滃鍦ㄨ噳涓� 鍦�2 鑺�300鍏冨仛鈥滃皬璨濋牠鈥�

銆€銆€娉細Beckham 鏄嫳 鍦嬭冻鐞冩槑鏄�

銆€銆€鏈夊叐寮电収鐗�锛屼竴寮电収鐗囦笂鏈変竴浣嶇敺澹噳涓婂钁楄冻鐞冩槑鏄熺殑鍚嶅瓧锛屽彟涓€寮电収鐗囦笂鏈変竴鍊嬬敺瀛愬湪鐞嗙櫦(f膩)锛屼粬瑕佹眰鐞嗙櫦(f膩)甯偤浠栬ō(sh猫)瑷堜竴鍊嬪皬璨濆厠婕㈠鐨勭櫦(f膩)鍨�銆�

涓€銆佹噳(y墨ng)鐢ㄦ枃瀵綔

銆€銆€To Whom It May Concern,

銆€銆€I am writing to ask you whether you could help me find a child in a remote area to whom I will offer my financial aid.

銆€銆€The candidate should be a girl at age 10 to 12 who is deprived of the opportunity to continue her education because of poverty. Her previous score reports should prove her potential to be an outstanding student in the future.

銆€銆€I would like to give the girl my financial support annually until she graduates from college. The money will cover her tuition fee and other expenses at school. Besides, I will correspond with her frequently so that she can seek advice whenever she needs.

銆€銆€I am looking forward to your reply.

銆€銆€Sincerely,

銆€銆€Li Ming

銆€銆€(125 words)

銆€銆€浜�銆佺煭鏂囧浣�

銆€銆€It goes without saying that the pictures reflect a common and serious problem in China鈥攚orship of celebrities among young people. In the left hand picture, a man has had David Beckham鈥檚 name written on his face. In the right hand picture, a man who is having a haircut asks his barber to cut his hair on the model of David Beckham, the popular British soccer star.

銆€銆€It is not uncommon for Chinese young people to have super stars as their idols. Most of them are fans of certain basketball players, football players, singers, actors and actresses at home and abroad. These fans not only watch the matches, TV serials and movies starring their heroes, but also pay a large sum of money to gain access to a live show, a concert and so on. Moreover, they imitate their idols in almost every aspect of their lives, such as their hair styles, glasses and clothes.

銆€銆€There is nothing wrong for one to have his own role model. However, if people adore the pop stars to the extent of losing self-control, they misunderstand the significance of popular culture. Anyway, popular culture is to enrich our life. Young people should learn how to live their own lives instead of blindly following others鈥� footsteps.